Lee Hyukjoon, Kim Eunhee, Lee Kyung Mi, Kim Jae Hyoung, Bae Yun Jung, Choi Byoung Se, Jung Cheolkyu
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 463-707, Korea.
Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 463-707, Korea. ; Department of Radiology, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul 130-701, Korea.
Korean J Radiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;16(4):906-13. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2015.16.4.906. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
Hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) without diffusion abnormalities is occasionally found in patients with an acute stroke. This study was to determine the prevalence and clinical implications of HARM without diffusion abnormalities.
There was a retrospective review of magnetic resonance images 578 patients with acute strokes and identified those who did not have acute infarction lesions, as mapped by diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). These patients were classified into an imaging-negative stroke and HARM without diffusion abnormalities groups, based on the DWI findings and postcontrast fluid attenuated inversion recovery images. The National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores at admission, 1 day, and 7 days after the event, as well as clinical data and risk factors, were compared between the imaging-negative stroke and HARM without diffusion abnormalities groups.
Seventy-seven acute stroke patients without any DWI abnormalities were found. There were 63 patients with an imaging-negative stroke (accounting for 10.9% of 578) and 13 patients with HARM without diffusion abnormalities (accounting for 2.4% of 578). The NIHSS scores at admission were higher in HARM without diffusion abnormalities group than in the imaging-negative stroke group (median, 4.5 vs. 1.0; p < 0.001), but the scores at 7 days after the event were not significantly different between the two groups (median, 0 vs. 0; p = 1). The patients with HARM without diffusion abnormalities were significantly older, compared with patients with an imaging-negative stroke (mean, 73.1 years vs. 55.9 years; p < 0.001).
Patients with HARM without diffusion abnormalities are older and have similarly favorable short-term neurological outcomes, compared with the patients with imaging-negative stroke.
急性卒中患者偶尔会出现无弥散异常的高信号急性再灌注标志物(HARM)。本研究旨在确定无弥散异常的HARM的患病率及其临床意义。
回顾性分析578例急性卒中患者的磁共振图像,通过弥散加权成像(DWI)确定那些没有急性梗死灶的患者。根据DWI结果和增强后液体衰减反转恢复图像,将这些患者分为影像学阴性卒中和无弥散异常的HARM组。比较影像学阴性卒中和无弥散异常的HARM组入院时、发病后1天和7天的美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分,以及临床资料和危险因素。
发现77例急性卒中患者无任何DWI异常。其中63例为影像学阴性卒中(占578例的10.9%),13例为无弥散异常的HARM(占578例的2.4%)。无弥散异常的HARM组入院时的NIHSS评分高于影像学阴性卒中组(中位数分别为4.5和1.0;p<0.001),但两组发病后7天的评分无显著差异(中位数均为0;p=1)。与影像学阴性卒中患者相比,无弥散异常的HARM患者年龄显著更大(平均年龄分别为73.1岁和55.9岁;p<0.001)。
与影像学阴性卒中患者相比,无弥散异常的HARM患者年龄更大,但短期神经功能预后相似。