Suppr超能文献

牙槽骨结构:一项系统综述与荟萃分析

Alveolar Bone Architecture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Monje Alberto, Chan Hsun-Liang, Galindo-Moreno Pablo, Elnayef Basel, Suarez-Lopez del Amo Fernando, Wang Feng, Wang Hom-Lay

机构信息

Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, MI.

Oral Surgery and Implant Dentistry Department, School of Dentistry, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2015 Nov;86(11):1231-48. doi: 10.1902/jop.2015.150263. Epub 2015 Jul 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is a need for studying bone characteristics systematically for a better understanding of planning (i.e., timing of placement and loading) and outcomes of implant therapy. Therefore, the aim of the present review is to evaluate alveolar bone microarchitecture and its modifiers.

METHODS

Two independent reviewers conducted electronic and manual literature searches in several databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Oral Health Group Trials Register, for articles published up to February 2015 reporting alveolar bone microstructure. The random-effect model was applied to calculate the weighted mean (WM) of total bone volume (TBV), which has a range from 0 to 1. TBV was stratified by anatomic locations, atrophic status, and types of specimens. Correlations between TBV and other bone-related parameters were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 800 articles were initially identified. After abstract/full-text review, 24 articles were included in the systematic review, of which 23 were also included in the quantitative analysis. The WM TBV was 0.365 (95% confidence interval = 0.278 to 0.452), higher in the maxillary/mandibular anterior sites than the maxillary/mandibular posterior sites. However, great variations existed within each anatomic location. Additionally, WM TBV was lower in atrophic sites than non-atrophic sites. TBV was correlated negatively with trabecular spacing (R(2) = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review suggests that the TBV might not be different between the defined anatomic locations. However, the atrophy status might influence TBV.

摘要

背景

为了更好地理解种植治疗的规划(即植入和加载的时机)及效果,有必要系统地研究骨特性。因此,本综述的目的是评估牙槽骨微结构及其调节因素。

方法

两名独立的评审员在多个数据库中进行了电子和手工文献检索,包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库和Cochrane口腔健康组试验注册库,以查找截至2015年2月发表的报告牙槽骨微结构的文章。应用随机效应模型计算总体积(TBV)的加权均值(WM),其范围为0至1。TBV按解剖位置萎缩状态和标本类型进行分层。还分析了TBV与其他骨相关参数之间的相关性。

结果

初步共识别出800篇文章。经过摘要/全文评审,24篇文章纳入系统评价,其中23篇也纳入定量分析。WM TBV为0.365(95%置信区间=0.278至0.452),在上颌/下颌前部区域高于上颌/下颌后部区域。然而,每个解剖位置内存在很大差异。此外,萎缩部位的WM TBV低于非萎缩部位。TBV与小梁间距呈负相关(R²=0.11)。

结论

本系统评价表明,在定义的解剖位置之间,TBV可能没有差异。然而,萎缩状态可能会影响TBV。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验