Suppr超能文献

[不同术前活检技术在骨肉瘤诊断中的准确性及其在预后评估中的价值]

[Accuracy of different preoperative biopsy techniques in diagnosis of osteosarcomas and their value in prognostic evaluation].

作者信息

Yuan Junqing, Zhang Huizhen, Jiang Zhiming, Zhou Jun, Yang Qingcheng, Zhang Zhichang

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.

E-mail:

出版信息

Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi. 2015 May;44(5):315-9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the difference in pathologic diagnostic accuracy among different histologic subtypes of osteosarcoma and different methods of preoperative biopsy, and the influence of diagnostic accuracy on prognosis of osteosarcoma.

METHODS

The preoperative biopsies, complete clinical, radiological and pathological data of 347 pathologically confirmed osteosarcomas were evaluated. According to the Pathological Diagnostic and Technical Specifications, the accuracy of preoperative biopsies was divided into 6 grades. 1: definite diagnosis, 2: basically definite diagnosis, 3: significant diagnosis, 4: descriptive diagnosis, 5:inadequate sampling, 6:misdiagnosis. 1 to 3 were defined as successful diagnosis,while 4 to 6 were defined as unsuccessful diagnosis.

RESULTS

Of the 347 biopsies, 252 were CT-guided needle biopsies by the radiologists, and 95 were core-needle biopsies by orthopedic surgeons without CT-guidance. The latter showed a higher overall biopsy success rate (97.9%) in all osteosarcomas. Biopsies by surgeons showed a higher biopsy success rate (95.4%) in conventional osteosarcoma, but lower success rate in telangiectatic (55.6%) and low-grade central osteosarcomas (63.7%). The accuracy of pathologic diagnosis of preoperative biopsy was related to patients' age, serum AKP level, imaging diagnosis, method of biopsy and the subtype of osteosarcoma. Comparing the groups with successful and unsuccessful diagnosis, there were significant differences in recurrence rate and mortality after operation (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The accuracy of pathologic diagnosis of preoperative biopsy are related to recurrence rate and mortality after operation. Biopsy by orthopedic surgeons without CT-guidance is reliable and safe, followed by primary diagnosis at frozen section and final diagnosis by routine pathologic sections for osteosarcomas located in the long bones of the extremities. Close integration of the preoperative pathologic diagnosis with clinical and radiological data will improve the accuracy of diagnosis.

摘要

目的

研究骨肉瘤不同组织学亚型及不同术前活检方法的病理诊断准确性差异,以及诊断准确性对骨肉瘤预后的影响。

方法

对347例经病理确诊的骨肉瘤患者的术前活检、完整的临床、影像学及病理资料进行评估。根据《病理诊断技术规范》,将术前活检的准确性分为6级。1级:明确诊断;2级:基本明确诊断;3级:高度怀疑诊断;4级:描述性诊断;5级:取材不足;6级:误诊。将1至3级定义为诊断成功,4至6级定义为诊断失败。

结果

347例活检中,252例为放射科医生在CT引导下经皮穿刺活检,95例为骨科医生未在CT引导下进行的粗针活检。后者在所有骨肉瘤中的总体活检成功率较高(97.9%)。外科医生进行的活检在传统骨肉瘤中的活检成功率较高(95.4%),但在毛细血管扩张型(55.6%)和低级别中央型骨肉瘤(63.7%)中的成功率较低。术前活检的病理诊断准确性与患者年龄、血清碱性磷酸酶水平、影像学诊断、活检方法及骨肉瘤亚型有关。比较诊断成功组和诊断失败组,术后复发率和死亡率存在显著差异(P<0.01)。

结论

术前活检的病理诊断准确性与术后复发率和死亡率相关。骨科医生未在CT引导下进行的活检可靠且安全,对于位于四肢长骨的骨肉瘤,其次是术中冰冻切片初步诊断,术后常规病理切片最终诊断。术前病理诊断与临床和影像学资料的紧密结合将提高诊断准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验