Schalet Benjamin D, Rothrock Nan E, Hays Ron D, Kazis Lewis E, Cook Karon F, Rutsohn Joshua P, Cella David
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 625 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
Department of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1524-30. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3453-9. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
Global health measures represent an attractive option for researchers and clinicians seeking a brief snapshot of a patient's overall perspective on his or her health. Because scores on different global health measures are not comparable, comparative effectiveness research (CER) is challenging.
To establish a common reporting metric so that the physical and mental health scores on the Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12 (©) ) can be converted into scores on the corresponding Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) Global Health scores.
Following a single-sample linking design, participants from an Internet panel completed items from the PROMIS Global Health and VR-12 Health Survey. A common metric was created using analyses based on item response theory (IRT), producing score cross-walk tables for the mental and physical health components of each measure. The linking relationships were evaluated by calculating the standard deviation of differences between the observed and linked PROMIS scores and estimating confidence intervals by sample size.
Participants (N = 2025) were 49 % male and 73 % white; mean age was 46 years.
Mental and physical health subscales of the PROMIS Global Health and the VR-12. The mean VR-12 physical component and mental component scores were 45.2 and 46.6, respectively; the mean PROMIS physical and mental health scores were 48.3 and 48.5, respectively.
We found evidence that the combined set of VR-12 and PROMIS items were relatively unidimensional and that we could proceed with linking. Linking worked better between the physical health than mental health scores using VR-12 item responses (vs. linking based on algorithmic scores). For each of the cross-walks, users can minimize the impact of linking error with modest increases in sample sizes.
VR-12 scores can be expressed on the PROMIS Global Health metric to facilitate the evaluation of treatment, including CER. Extending these results to other common measures of global health is encouraged.
对于寻求快速了解患者对自身健康总体看法的研究人员和临床医生而言,全球健康指标是一个颇具吸引力的选择。由于不同全球健康指标的得分不可比,比较效果研究(CER)颇具挑战性。
建立一个通用的报告指标,以便将退伍军人兰德12项健康调查(VR - 12(©))中的身心健康得分转换为相应的患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS(®))全球健康得分。
采用单样本链接设计,来自互联网小组的参与者完成了PROMIS全球健康和VR - 12健康调查的项目。基于项目反应理论(IRT)分析创建了一个通用指标,生成了每项测量的身心健康成分的得分对照表。通过计算观察到的PROMIS得分与链接得分之间差异的标准差并按样本量估计置信区间来评估链接关系。
参与者(N = 2025)中49%为男性,73%为白人;平均年龄为46岁。
PROMIS全球健康和VR - 12的身心健康分量表。VR - 12身体成分和心理成分的平均得分分别为45.2和46.6;PROMIS身心健康的平均得分分别为48.3和48.5。
我们发现有证据表明VR - 12和PROMIS项目的组合相对单维,因此可以进行链接。使用VR - 12项目反应(相对于基于算法得分的链接)时,身体健康得分之间的链接效果比心理健康得分更好。对于每个对照表,用户可以通过适度增加样本量来最小化链接误差的影响。
VR - 12得分可以用PROMIS全球健康指标表示,以促进包括CER在内的治疗评估。鼓励将这些结果推广到其他常见的全球健康测量指标。