Thurston L, Williams G
:L Thurston, 4/93 Parkyn Parade, Mooloolaba, Queensland 4557, Australia. Email lydia.
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45(2):173-9. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2015.217.
Edward Jenner is recognised today as the father of vaccination but, as this paper explores, he was not the only Gloucestershire doctor to be linked to this discovery. John Fewster, a local surgeon and apothecary, is also said to have experimented with vaccination, many years before Jenner. This claim is made in a letter addressed to John Coakley Lettsom, written by John Player, a Quaker farmer. Player describes in detail Fewster's realisation that cowpox could be used to protect against smallpox. This letter is frequently cited but has not previously been subjected to critical analysis. We have identified several inconsistencies, including conflicting dates and a possible ulterior motive in that Player's son was to marry Fewster's daughter. We think it unlikely that Player, a devout Quaker, would have consciously fabricated evidence, but argue that the discrepancies in his account undermine the assumption that Fewster carried out vaccination experiments prior to Jenner. We also explore the assertion that Fewster presented a paper in 1765 on the subject of cowpox and its protective effect over smallpox. We conclude that, although there is no doubt that Fewster did pre-empt Jenner's discovery of vaccination, he did not realise the significance or importance of this momentous medical advance.
如今,爱德华·詹纳被公认为疫苗接种之父,但正如本文所探讨的,他并非唯一与这一发现有关联的格洛斯特郡医生。据说,当地外科医生兼药剂师约翰·富斯特在詹纳之前许多年就已进行过疫苗接种实验。这一说法出自贵格会农民约翰·普莱尔写给约翰·科克利·莱特森的一封信中。普莱尔详细描述了富斯特是如何认识到牛痘可用于预防天花的。这封信经常被引用,但此前从未受到批判性分析。我们发现了几个矛盾之处,包括相互冲突的日期以及一个可能的潜在动机,即普莱尔的儿子要娶富斯特的女儿。我们认为,虔诚的贵格会信徒普莱尔不太可能有意识地伪造证据,但认为他叙述中的差异削弱了富斯特在詹纳之前就进行疫苗接种实验这一假设。我们还探讨了富斯特在1765年提交了一篇关于牛痘及其对天花的预防作用的论文这一说法。我们的结论是,虽然毫无疑问富斯特确实先于詹纳发现了疫苗接种,但他并未意识到这一重大医学进步的意义或重要性。