Luo Yi, Feng Chunliang, Wu Tingting, Broster Lucas S, Cai Huajian, Gu Ruolei, Luo Yue-jia
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
1] Institute of Affective and Social Neuroscience, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China [2] Department of Psychology, Queens College, The City University of New York, Queens, NY 11367, USA.
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 17;5:12127. doi: 10.1038/srep12127.
Social comparison, a widespread phenomenon in human society, has been found to affect outcome evaluation. The need to belong to a social group may result in distinct neural responses to diverse social comparison outcomes. To extend previous studies by examining how social comparison with hierarchical characteristics is temporally processed, electroencephalography responses were recorded in the current study. Participants played a lottery game with two pseudo-players simultaneously and received both their own and the other two players' outcomes. Results of three event-related potential components, including the P2, the feedback-related negativity (FRN), and the late positive component (LPC), indicate that social comparison manifests in three stages. First, outcomes indicating a different performance from others elicited a larger P2 than evenness. Second, the FRN showed hierarchical sensitivity to social comparison outcomes. This effect manifested asymmetrically. Finally, large difference between the participant's outcome and the other two players' evoked a larger LPC than the medium difference and the even condition. We suggest that during social comparison, people detect if there is any difference between self and others, and then evaluate the information of this difference hierarchically, and finally interpret the situations in which oneself deviates from the group as most motivationally salient.
社会比较是人类社会中一种普遍存在的现象,已被发现会影响结果评估。归属社会群体的需求可能会导致对不同社会比较结果产生不同的神经反应。为了通过研究具有等级特征的社会比较如何在时间上进行处理来扩展先前的研究,本研究记录了脑电图反应。参与者同时与两个虚拟玩家进行抽奖游戏,并收到自己以及另外两个玩家的结果。包括P2、反馈相关负波(FRN)和晚期正成分(LPC)在内的三个事件相关电位成分的结果表明,社会比较体现在三个阶段。首先,表明与他人表现不同的结果比表现相当的结果引发更大的P2。其次,FRN对社会比较结果表现出等级敏感性。这种效应表现出不对称性。最后,参与者的结果与另外两个玩家的结果之间的巨大差异比中等差异和相当条件引发更大的LPC。我们认为,在社会比较过程中,人们会检测自己与他人之间是否存在差异,然后对这种差异的信息进行等级评估,最后将自己偏离群体的情况解释为最具动机显著性的情况。