Mercer Catherine H, Fuller Sebastian S, Saunders John M, Muniina Pamela, Copas Andrew J, Hart Graham J, Sutcliffe Lorna J, Johnson Anne M, Cassell Jackie A, Estcourt Claudia S
Research Department of Infection and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Centre for Immunology and Infectious Disease, Blizard Institute of Cell & Molecular Science, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 17;15:676. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1951-7.
In Britain, young people continue to bear the burden of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) so efforts are required, especially among men, to encourage STI testing. The SPORTSMART study trialled an intervention that sought to achieve this by offering chlamydia and gonorrhoea test-kits to men attending amateur football clubs between October and December 2012. With football the highest participation team sport among men in England, this paper examines the potential public health benefit of offering STI testing to men in this setting by assessing their sociodemographic characteristics, sexual behaviours, and healthcare behaviour and comparing them to men in the general population.
Data were collected from 192 (male) members of 6 football clubs in London, United Kingdom, aged 18-44 years via a 20-item pen-and-paper self-completion questionnaire administered 2 weeks after the intervention. These were compared to data collected from 409 men of a similar age who were resident in London when interviewed during 2010-2012 for the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles (Natsal-3), a national probability survey that used computer-assisted-personal-interviewing with computer-assisted-self-interview. Age standardisation and multivariable regression were used to account for sociodemographic differences between the surveys.
Relative to men in the general population, SPORTSMART men were younger (32.8 % vs. 21.7 % aged under 25 y), and more likely to report (all past year) at least 2 sexual partners (adjusted odds ratio, AOR: 3.25, 95 % CI: 2.15-4.92), concurrent partners (AOR: 2.05, 95 % CI: 1.39-3.02), and non-use of condoms (AOR: 2.17, 95 % CI: 1.39-3.41). No difference was observed in STI/HIV risk perception (AOR for reporting "not at all at risk" of STIs: 1.25, 95 % CI: 0.76-2.04; of HIV: AOR: 1.54, 95 % CI: 0.93-2.55), nor in reporting STI testing in the past year (AOR: 0.83, 95 % CI: 0.44-1.54), which was reported by only one in six men.
Relative to young men in the general population, football club members who completed the SPORTSMART survey reported greater sexual risk behaviour but similar STI/HIV risk perception and STI testing history. Offering STI testing in amateur football clubs may therefore widen access to STI testing and health promotion messages for men at higher STI risk, which, given the minority currently testing and the popularity of football in England, should yield both individual and public health benefit.
在英国,年轻人仍然承受着性传播感染(STIs)的负担,因此需要做出努力,特别是在男性中,鼓励进行性传播感染检测。SPORTSMART研究进行了一项干预试验,试图通过在2012年10月至12月期间向参加业余足球俱乐部的男性提供衣原体和淋病检测试剂盒来实现这一目标。在英格兰,足球是男性参与度最高的团队运动,本文通过评估参加该试验男性的社会人口学特征、性行为和医疗保健行为,并将他们与普通人群中的男性进行比较,来研究在这种环境下为男性提供性传播感染检测的潜在公共卫生益处。
通过在干预两周后发放一份20项的纸笔自填问卷,从英国伦敦6个足球俱乐部的192名年龄在18 - 44岁的男性成员中收集数据。将这些数据与在2010 - 2012年第三次全国性态度和生活方式调查(Natsal - 3)期间接受访谈的409名年龄相仿且居住在伦敦的男性数据进行比较,Natsal - 3是一项全国概率调查,采用计算机辅助个人访谈和计算机辅助自我访谈。使用年龄标准化和多变量回归来解释调查之间的社会人口学差异。
与普通人群中的男性相比,参与SPORTSMART研究的男性更年轻(25岁以下的比例分别为32.8%和21.7%),并且更有可能报告(均为过去一年)至少有2个性伴侣(调整后的优势比,AOR:3.25,95%置信区间:2.15 - 4.92)、同时有多个性伴侣(AOR:2.05,95%置信区间:1.39 - 3.02)以及未使用避孕套(AOR:2.17,95%置信区间:1.39 - 3.41)。在性传播感染/艾滋病毒风险认知方面未观察到差异(报告性传播感染“完全没有风险”的AOR:1.25,95%置信区间:0.76 - 2.04;艾滋病毒的AOR:1.54,95%置信区间:0.93 - 2.55),在过去一年报告进行性传播感染检测方面也没有差异(AOR:0.83,95%置信区间:0.44 - 1.54),只有六分之一的男性报告进行过检测。
与普通人群中的年轻男性相比,完成SPORTSMART调查的足球俱乐部成员报告了更高的性风险行为,但性传播感染/艾滋病毒风险认知和性传播感染检测史相似。因此,在业余足球俱乐部提供性传播感染检测可能会扩大对性传播感染风险较高男性的检测机会以及健康促进信息的传播,鉴于目前进行检测的人数较少以及足球在英格兰的受欢迎程度,这应该会给个人和公共卫生带来益处。