Davis Alissa, Best John, Luo Juhua, Van Der Pol Barbara, Dodge Brian, Meyerson Beth, Aalsma Matthew, Wei Chongyi, Tucker Joseph D
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA UNC-Project China, Guangzhou, China Rural Center for AIDS/STD Prevention, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA.
UNC-Project China, Guangzhou, China School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Int J STD AIDS. 2016 Sep;27(10):840-9. doi: 10.1177/0956462415596302. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
Differences in risk behaviours between men who have sex with men (MSM) and men who have sex with both men and women (MSMW) have important implications for HIV and sexually transmitted infection (STI) transmission. We examined differences in risk behaviours, HIV/STI testing, self-reported HIV/STI diagnoses, and linkage to HIV care between MSM and MSMW across China. Participants were recruited through three MSM-focused websites in China. An online survey containing items on socio-demographics, risk behaviours, testing history, self-reported HIV/STI diagnosis, and linkage to and retention in HIV care was completed from September to October 2014. Chi square tests and logistic regression analyses were conducted. MSMW were less likely to use a condom during last anal sex (p ≤ 0.01) and more likely to engage in group sex (p ≤ 0.01) and transactional sex (p ≤ 0.01) compared to MSM. Self-reported HIV/STI testing and positivity rates between MSM and MSMW were similar. Among HIV-infected MSM, there was no difference in rates of linkage to or retention in antiretroviral therapy when comparing MSM and MSMW. Chinese MSM and MSMW may benefit from different HIV and STI intervention and prevention strategies. Achieving a successful decrease in HIV/STI epidemics among Chinese MSM and MSMW will depend on the ability of targeted and culturally congruent HIV/STI control programmes to facilitate a reduction in risk behaviours.
男男性行为者(MSM)与男男性行为和男女两性性行为者(MSMW)之间的风险行为差异对艾滋病毒和性传播感染(STI)的传播具有重要影响。我们研究了中国MSM和MSMW在风险行为、艾滋病毒/性传播感染检测、自我报告的艾滋病毒/性传播感染诊断以及艾滋病毒护理联系方面的差异。参与者通过中国三个专注于男男性行为者的网站招募。2014年9月至10月完成了一项在线调查,内容包括社会人口统计学、风险行为、检测史、自我报告的艾滋病毒/性传播感染诊断以及艾滋病毒护理联系和留存情况。进行了卡方检验和逻辑回归分析。与MSM相比,MSMW在最近一次肛交时使用安全套的可能性较小(p≤0.01),进行群交(p≤0.01)和交易性性行为(p≤0.01)的可能性较大。MSM和MSMW之间自我报告的艾滋病毒/性传播感染检测率和阳性率相似。在感染艾滋病毒的MSM中,比较MSM和MSMW时,接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的联系率或留存率没有差异。中国的MSM和MSMW可能受益于不同的艾滋病毒和性传播感染干预及预防策略。在中国MSM和MSMW中成功降低艾滋病毒/性传播感染流行率将取决于有针对性且符合文化背景的艾滋病毒/性传播感染控制项目促进降低风险行为的能力。