Monnier Yan, Simon Christian
Service d'Oto-rhino-laryngologie-Chirurgie cervico-faciale, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Université de Lausanne (UNIL), Rue du Bugnon 21, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2015 Sep;16(9):42. doi: 10.1007/s11864-015-0362-4.
Therapeutic options for early stage oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) include both surgery and radiotherapy as single treatment modality. Retrospective data reporting on locoregional control and survival rates in early stage OPSCC have shown equivalent efficacy, although no prospective randomized trials are available to confirm these results. Given the assumed comparable oncologic results in both groups, complication rates and functional outcomes associated with each modality play a major role when making treatment decisions. Radiotherapy is used preferentially in many centers because few trials have reported higher complication rates in surgical patients. However, these adverse effects were mainly due to traditional invasive open surgical approaches used for access to the oropharynx. In order to decrease the morbidity of these techniques, transoral surgical (TOS) approaches have been developed progressively. They include transoral laser microsurgery (TLM), transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and conventional transoral techniques. Meta-analysis comparing these new approaches with radiotherapy showed equivalent efficacy in terms of oncologic results. Furthermore, studies reporting on functional outcomes in patients undergoing TOS for OPSCC did not show major long-term functional impairment following treatment. Given the abovementioned statements, it is our practice to treat early stage OPSCC as follows: whenever a single modality treatment seems feasible (T1-2 and N0-1), we advocate TOS resection of the primary tumor associated with selective neck dissection, as indicated. In our opinion, the advantage of this approach relies on the possibility to stratify the risk of disease progression based on the pathological features of the tumor. Depending on the results, adjuvant radiation treatment or chemoradiotherapy can be chosen for high-risk patients. For tumors without adverse features, no adjuvant treatment is given. This approach also allows prevention of potential radiation-induced late complications while keeping radiotherapy as an option for any second primary lesions whenever needed. Definitive radiotherapy is generally reserved for selected patients with specific anatomical location associated with poor functional outcome following surgery, such as tumor of the soft palate, or for patients with severe comorbidities that do not allow surgical treatment.
早期口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)的治疗选择包括手术和放疗这两种单一治疗方式。关于早期OPSCC局部区域控制和生存率的回顾性数据报告显示了等效疗效,尽管尚无前瞻性随机试验来证实这些结果。鉴于两组在肿瘤学结果方面假定具有可比性,在做出治疗决策时,每种治疗方式相关的并发症发生率和功能结局起着主要作用。许多中心优先使用放疗,因为很少有试验报告手术患者的并发症发生率更高。然而,这些不良反应主要归因于用于进入口咽的传统侵入性开放手术方法。为了降低这些技术的发病率,经口手术(TOS)方法已逐步发展起来。它们包括经口激光显微手术(TLM)、经口机器人手术(TORS)和传统经口技术。将这些新方法与放疗进行比较的荟萃分析显示,在肿瘤学结果方面具有等效疗效。此外,关于接受TOS治疗OPSCC患者功能结局的研究并未显示治疗后有重大的长期功能损害。鉴于上述情况,我们对早期OPSCC的治疗方法如下:只要单一治疗方式似乎可行(T1-2和N0-1),我们主张对原发性肿瘤进行TOS切除并根据指征进行选择性颈部清扫。我们认为,这种方法的优势在于有可能根据肿瘤的病理特征对疾病进展风险进行分层。根据结果,可对高危患者选择辅助放疗或放化疗。对于无不良特征的肿瘤,不给予辅助治疗。这种方法还可以预防潜在的放疗引起的晚期并发症,同时在需要时将放疗作为任何第二原发性病变的选择。确定性放疗通常保留给特定解剖位置的选定患者,这些患者手术后功能结局较差,如软腭肿瘤,或患有不允许手术治疗的严重合并症的患者。