Blankman P, Hasan D, Bikker I G, Gommers D
Department of Adult Intensive Care, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2016 Jan;60(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/aas.12589. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
Stress and strain are parameters to describe respiratory mechanics during mechanical ventilation. Calculations of stress require invasive and difficult to perform esophageal pressure measurements. The hypothesis of the present study was: Can lung stress be reliably calculated based on non-invasive lung volume measurements, during a decremental Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) trial in mechanically ventilated patients with different diseases?
Data of 26 pressure-controlled ventilated patients admitted to the ICU with different lung conditions were retrospectively analyzed: 11 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), 9 neurology, and 6 lung disorders. During a decremental PEEP trial (from 15 to 0 cmH2 O in three steps) end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) measurements were performed at each PEEP step, without interruption of mechanical ventilation. Strain, specific elastance, and stress were calculated for each PEEP level. Elastance was calculated as delta PEEP divided by delta PEEP volume, whereas specific elastance is elastance times the FRC. Stress was calculated as specific elastance times the strain. Global strain was divided into dynamic (tidal volume) and static (PEEP) strain.
Strain calculations based on FRC showed mainly changes in static component, whereas calculations based on EELV showed changes in both the static and dynamic component of strain. Stress calculated from EELV measurements was 24.0 ± 2.7 and 13.1 ± 3.8 cmH2 O in the lung disorder group at 15 and 5 cmH2 O PEEP. For the normal lungs, the stress values were 19.2 ± 3.2 and 10.9 ± 3.3 cmH2 O, respectively. These values are comparable to earlier publications. Specific elastance calculations were comparable in patients with neurologic and lung disorders, and lower in the CABG group due to recruitment in this latter group.
Stress and strain can reliably be calculated at the bedside based on non-invasive EELV measurements during a decremental PEEP trial in patients with different diseases.
压力和应变是描述机械通气期间呼吸力学的参数。压力的计算需要进行侵入性且操作困难的食管压力测量。本研究的假设是:在患有不同疾病的机械通气患者进行递减呼气末正压(PEEP)试验期间,能否基于无创肺容积测量可靠地计算肺压力?
回顾性分析了26例因不同肺部疾病入住重症监护病房(ICU)且采用压力控制通气的患者的数据:11例冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者、9例神经科患者和6例肺部疾病患者。在递减PEEP试验(分三步从15 cmH₂O降至0 cmH₂O)期间,在每个PEEP水平进行呼气末肺容积(EELV)测量,且不中断机械通气。计算每个PEEP水平的应变、比弹性和压力。弹性计算为ΔPEEP除以ΔPEEP容积,而比弹性是弹性乘以功能残气量(FRC)。压力计算为比弹性乘以应变。整体应变分为动态(潮气量)和静态(PEEP)应变。
基于FRC的应变计算主要显示静态成分的变化,而基于EELV的计算显示应变的静态和动态成分均有变化。在肺部疾病组中,PEEP为15 cmH₂O和5 cmH₂O时,根据EELV测量计算出的压力分别为24.0±2.7和13.1±3.8 cmH₂O。对于正常肺,压力值分别为19.2±3.2和10.9±3.3 cmH₂O。这些值与早期出版物中的值相当。神经科和肺部疾病患者的比弹性计算结果相当,而CABG组由于该组存在肺复张,比弹性较低。
在患有不同疾病的患者进行递减PEEP试验期间,基于无创EELV测量可在床边可靠地计算压力和应变。