Quinn Kerry, Quinn Maureen, Moreno Christina, Soundar Esther, Teruya Jun, Hui Shiu-Ki
Division of Transfusion Medicine and Coagulation, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, United States of America.
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, United States of America.
Blood Transfus. 2015 Oct;13(4):595-9. doi: 10.2450/2015.0300-14. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
Data on age of blood and its impact on donor exposure and inventory in the paediatric setting are lacking. The standard of practice of reserving a specific red blood cell (RBC) unit for neonates who may require repeat transfusions is unique to the paediatric setting. Requiring transfusion of fresher RBC units may increase the exposure of neonates to multiple units and negatively affect the supply of fresh RBC. We constructed a transfusion model based on a 6 months of retrospective neonatal transfusion data at our institution.
All neonates (≤4 months old) at Texas Children's Hospital who received a RBC transfusion from June to November 2011 were included and RBC transfusion data were compiled. The age of blood at the time of each RBC transfusion was recorded. These data were reviewed to calculate exposure and inventory impact if each transfusion had been restricted to RBC either ≤7 or ≤14 days old at transfusion.
A total of 216 neonates received 938 RBC transfusions. Of these, 393 (42%) were fresh RBC (≤14 days old), even without a required age guideline. Requiring fresh (≤14 days) RBC for all transfusions in this period would have resulted in 70 additional fresh units and one or more additional exposures in 44 patients. Requiring fresher (≤7 days old) RBC would have resulted in an additional 147 units and. one or more additional exposures in 54 patients.
The more conservative model of fresh (≤7 days old) RBC would greatly increase fresh RBC inventory requirements, and 25% of transfused neonates would require additional RBC exposure. Based on retrospective data and the two transfusion models, it can be concluded that requiring RBC ≤14 days old for neonatal transfusion would best balance the use of fresher RBC with the smallest increase in patient exposure (20%) and minimum impact on the RBC inventory.
缺乏关于血液保存时间及其对儿科环境中供体暴露和库存影响的数据。为可能需要反复输血的新生儿预留特定红细胞(RBC)单位的实践标准是儿科环境所特有的。要求输注更新鲜的RBC单位可能会增加新生儿对多个单位的暴露,并对新鲜RBC的供应产生负面影响。我们根据本机构6个月的回顾性新生儿输血数据构建了一个输血模型。
纳入2011年6月至11月在德克萨斯儿童医院接受RBC输血的所有新生儿(≤4个月),并汇总RBC输血数据。记录每次RBC输血时的血液保存时间。对这些数据进行审查,以计算如果每次输血仅限于保存时间≤7天或≤14天的RBC时的暴露和库存影响。
共有216名新生儿接受了938次RBC输血。其中,393次(42%)为新鲜RBC(≤14天),即使没有规定的保存时间指南。在此期间,要求所有输血都使用新鲜(≤14天)RBC将导致额外70个新鲜单位,并使44名患者有一次或多次额外暴露。要求更新鲜(≤7天)的RBC将导致额外147个单位,并使54名患者有一次或多次额外暴露。
更保守的新鲜(≤7天)RBC模型将大大增加新鲜RBC库存需求,并且25%的输血新生儿将需要额外的RBC暴露。基于回顾性数据和两种输血模型,可以得出结论,要求新生儿输血使用≤14天的RBC将最能平衡更新鲜RBC的使用,同时患者暴露增加最小(20%),对RBC库存的影响最小。