Gomes Thayse Natacha, Katzmarzyk Peter T, dos Santos Fernanda Karina, de Chaves Raquel Nichele, Santos Daniel, Pereira Sara, Champagne Catherine M, Hedeker Donald, Maia José
Center of Research, Education, Innovation and Intervention in Sport (CIFI2D), Kinanthropometry Lab, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Plácido Costa, 91, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal.
Pennington Biomedical Research Center, Louisiana State University, 6400 Perkins Rd, Baton Rouge, LA 70808-4124, USA.
Nutrients. 2015 Jul 16;7(7):5889-904. doi: 10.3390/nu7075258.
The purpose of this research was to investigate the relationship between body mass index (BMI) and sedentariness (Sed) in children and to examine the influence of child and school correlates on their variation. The sample comprises 580 children (337 girls, 9-11 years). Sedentariness was assessed with an accelerometer, and BMI was computed. Child- and school-level covariates were analyzed using multilevel models. No significant correlation between Sed and BMI was found. School context explains 5% and 1.5% of the total variance in Sed and BMI, respectively. At the child level, only moderate-to-vigorous physical activity was associated with both Sed (β = -0.02 ± 0.002) and BMI (β = -0.005 ± 0.002). Sleep time is related to Sed (β = -0.42 ± 0.04), while sex (β = 1.97 ± 0.13), biological maturity (β = 1.25 ± 0.07), media in the bedroom (β = 0.26 ± 0.08) and healthy (β = -0.09 ± 0.03) and unhealthy (β = -0.07 ± 0.04) diet scores were associated with BMI. None of the school-level covariates were related to BMI, but access to cafeteria (β = -0.97 ± 0.25), playground equipment (β = -0.67 ± 0.20) and restaurants (β = 0.16 ± 0.08) were related to Sed. In conclusion, Sed and BMI were not correlated. Further, they have different correlates, while children's traits seem to play more relevant roles in their differences in Sed and BMI than the school milieu. This information should be taken into account when strategies to reduce Sed and BMI are implemented.
本研究的目的是调查儿童体重指数(BMI)与久坐行为(Sed)之间的关系,并检验儿童及学校相关因素对其变化的影响。样本包括580名儿童(337名女孩,9至11岁)。使用加速度计评估久坐行为,并计算BMI。使用多水平模型分析儿童和学校层面的协变量。未发现Sed与BMI之间存在显著相关性。学校环境分别解释了Sed和BMI总方差的5%和1.5%。在儿童层面,只有中等到剧烈的身体活动与Sed(β = -0.02 ± 0.002)和BMI(β = -0.005 ± 0.002)相关。睡眠时间与Sed相关(β = -0.42 ± 0.04),而性别(β = 1.97 ± 0.13)、生物成熟度(β = 1.25 ± 0.07)、卧室中的媒体设备(β = 0.26 ± 0.08)以及健康(β = -0.09 ± 0.03)和不健康(β = -0.07 ± 0.04)饮食得分与BMI相关。没有学校层面的协变量与BMI相关,但自助餐厅的使用情况(β = -0.97 ± 0.25)、操场设备(β = -0.67 ± 0.20)和餐厅(β = 0.16 ± 0.08)与Sed相关。总之,Sed与BMI不相关。此外,它们有不同的相关因素,而且儿童的特质在其Sed和BMI差异中似乎比学校环境发挥着更重要的作用。在实施减少Sed和BMI的策略时应考虑到这些信息。