• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.鉴别头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者转移性淋巴结的表观扩散系数
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-402. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.14468.
2
Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy.淋巴结坏死和实性部分的表观扩散系数值:颈部淋巴结病鉴别诊断中的价值。
Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar;68(3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.04.002. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
3
Validity of 3-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for distinction of reactive and metastatic lymph nodes in head-and-neck carcinoma.3特斯拉扩散加权磁共振成像在鉴别头颈部癌反应性和转移性淋巴结中的有效性
J Cancer Res Ther. 2020 Apr-Jun;16(3):587-593. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_55_19.
4
Diagnostic Value of Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluation of Metastatic Neck Lymph Nodes in Head and Neck Cancer: A Sample of Iranian Patient.扩散加权磁共振成像在评估头颈癌颈部转移性淋巴结中的诊断价值:以伊朗患者为例
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 Jun 1;20(6):1789-1795. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.6.1789.
5
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging.头颈部鳞状细胞癌:扩散加权磁共振成像在淋巴结分期中的价值。
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):134-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511080128. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
6
Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for the differentiation between lymphoma and metastatic lymph nodes of squamous cell carcinoma in head and neck region.头颈部区域淋巴瘤与鳞状细胞癌转移性淋巴结鉴别的表观扩散系数图直方图分析
Acta Radiol. 2018 Jun;59(6):672-680. doi: 10.1177/0284185117730688. Epub 2017 Sep 4.
7
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI) derived from PET/MRI for lymph node assessment in patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).正电子发射断层扫描/磁共振成像(PET/MRI)弥散加权成像(DWI)用于头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)患者的淋巴结评估。
Cancer Imaging. 2020 Aug 8;20(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40644-020-00334-x.
8
Lymph node metastasis in head and neck squamous carcinoma: Efficacy of intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging for the differential diagnosis.头颈部鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移:体素内不相干运动磁共振成像在鉴别诊断中的效能
Eur J Radiol. 2017 May;90:159-165. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.039. Epub 2017 Mar 2.
9
Usefulness of 3T diffusion-weighted MRI for discrimination of reactive and metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study.3T 扩散加权 MRI 对鉴别口腔鳞癌患者反应性和转移性颈淋巴结的作用:一项初步研究。
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014;43(3):20130202. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20130202. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
10
Utility of diffusion MRI characteristics of cervical lymph nodes as disease classifier between patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and healthy volunteers.弥散磁共振成像在头颈部鳞癌患者和健康志愿者间作为颈部淋巴结疾病分类器的应用。
NMR Biomed. 2021 Nov;34(11):e4587. doi: 10.1002/nbm.4587. Epub 2021 Jul 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in lymph node staging for prostate cancer.扩散加权成像(DWI)在前列腺癌淋巴结分期中的应用
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Oct;7(5):814-823. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.08.04.
2
Cervical lymphadenopathy: can the histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient help to differentiate between lymphoma and squamous cell carcinoma in patients with unknown clinical primary tumor?颈部淋巴结病:表观扩散系数直方图分析能否帮助区分不明临床原发性肿瘤患者的淋巴瘤和鳞状细胞癌?
Radiol Med. 2019 Jan;124(1):19-26. doi: 10.1007/s11547-018-0940-1. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
3
The diagnostic role of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in hypopharyngeal carcinoma.扩散加权磁共振成像在下咽癌中的诊断作用。
Oncol Lett. 2018 Apr;15(4):5533-5544. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8053. Epub 2018 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Functional imaging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and FDG PET/CT: quantitative analysis of ADC and SUV.头颈部鳞状细胞癌的扩散加权 MRI 和 FDG PET/CT 功能成像:ADC 和 SUV 的定量分析。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Jun;40(6):842-52. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2351-9. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
2
Characterization and therapy monitoring of head and neck carcinomas using diffusion-imaging-based intravoxel incoherent motion parameters-preliminary results.基于体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像参数对头颈部癌的特征描述和治疗监测:初步结果。
Neuroradiology. 2013 May;55(5):527-36. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1154-9. Epub 2013 Feb 17.
3
Necrotic cervical nodes: usefulness of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation of suppurative lymphadenitis from malignancy.坏死性颈部淋巴结:弥散加权磁共振成像在鉴别化脓性淋巴结炎与恶性肿瘤中的作用。
Eur J Radiol. 2013 Jan;82(1):e28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.08.014. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
4
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: differentiation of histologic grade with standard- and high-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI.头颈部鳞状细胞癌:标准和高 b 值扩散加权 MRI 鉴别组织学分级。
Head Neck. 2013 May;35(5):626-31. doi: 10.1002/hed.23008. Epub 2012 May 18.
5
Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck.头部和颈部的弥散加权磁共振成像。
Radiology. 2012 Apr;263(1):19-32. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101821.
6
Apparent diffusion coefficient values of necrotic and solid portion of lymph nodes: differential diagnostic value in cervical lymphadenopathy.淋巴结坏死和实性部分的表观扩散系数值:颈部淋巴结病鉴别诊断中的价值。
Clin Radiol. 2013 Mar;68(3):224-31. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.04.002. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
7
Efficacy of diffusion-weighted imaging for the differentiation between lymphomas and carcinomas of the nasopharynx and oropharynx: correlations of apparent diffusion coefficients and histologic features.弥散加权成像在鉴别鼻咽和口咽部淋巴瘤与癌中的作用:表观弥散系数与组织学特征的相关性。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Apr;33(4):761-6. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2834. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
8
Applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.弥散加权磁共振成像在头颈部鳞状细胞癌中的应用。
Neuroradiology. 2010 Sep;52(9):773-84. doi: 10.1007/s00234-010-0743-0. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
9
Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical lymph nodes: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.磁共振弥散加权成像在颈部淋巴结中的应用:良恶性病变的鉴别诊断。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Feb;77(2):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.07.039. Epub 2009 Aug 28.
10
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging.头颈部鳞状细胞癌:扩散加权磁共振成像在淋巴结分期中的价值。
Radiology. 2009 Apr;251(1):134-46. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2511080128. Epub 2009 Feb 27.

鉴别头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者转移性淋巴结的表观扩散系数

Apparent diffusion coefficient for discriminating metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

作者信息

Pekçevik Yeliz, Çukurova İbrahim, Arslan İlker Burak

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-402. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.14468.

DOI:10.5152/dir.2015.14468
PMID:26200481
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4557323/
Abstract

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic lymph nodes underwent 1.5 Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The ADC values of the histologically proven metastases were evaluated retrospectively and mean ADC values were compared using one-way analysis of variance test. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to identify ADC threshold values.

RESULTS

We included 33 patients (27 males, 6 females; mean age, 60.7 years) with 53 metastatic lymph nodes in the study. Mean ADC values for nodal metastases of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) (n=7), oropharyngeal (n=12), laryngeal (n=27), and hypopharyngeal (n=7) carcinoma were (0.810±0.158)×10-3 mm2/s, (0.985±0.099)×10-3 mm2/s, (1.037±0.150)×10-3 mm2/s, and (0.948±0.081)×10-3 mm2/s, respectively. The mean ADC values of nodal metastases of NPC were significantly lower than ADC values of laryngeal carcinoma (LSCC) (P = 0.002). An ADC value less than 0.890×10-3 mm2/s was found to facilitate differentiation of NPC from LSCC with a sensitivity of 71% and specificity of 85% (area under the curve, 0.852).

CONCLUSION

The mean ADC values showed significant differences between nodal metastases of NPC and LSCC. Considering SCCs as a single group may affect the accuracy of ADC-based differentiation. Location of the primary tumor should be taken into account and cutoff values should be determined separately for each anatomical location.

摘要

目的

我们旨在评估头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCC)患者转移性淋巴结的表观扩散系数(ADC)值。

方法

有转移性淋巴结的患者接受了1.5特斯拉扩散加权磁共振成像(MRI)。对经组织学证实的转移灶的ADC值进行回顾性评估,并使用单因素方差分析检验比较平均ADC值。进行受试者操作特征分析以确定ADC阈值。

结果

我们纳入了33例患者(27例男性,6例女性;平均年龄60.7岁),研究中有53个转移性淋巴结。鼻咽癌(NPC)(n = 7)、口咽癌(n = 12)、喉癌(n = 27)和下咽癌(n = 7)的淋巴结转移灶的平均ADC值分别为(0.810±0.158)×10⁻³mm²/s、(0.985±0.099)×10⁻³mm²/s、(1.037±0.150)×10⁻³mm²/s和(0.948±0.081)×10⁻³mm²/s。NPC淋巴结转移灶的平均ADC值显著低于喉癌(LSCC)的ADC值(P = 0.002)。发现ADC值小于0.890×10⁻³mm²/s有助于鉴别NPC与LSCC,灵敏度为71%,特异性为85%(曲线下面积,0.852)。

结论

NPC和LSCC的淋巴结转移灶的平均ADC值存在显著差异。将SCC视为单一组可能会影响基于ADC的鉴别准确性。应考虑原发肿瘤的位置,并为每个解剖位置分别确定临界值。