• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

质量改进项目的成本效益:一个用于考量基于实施的质量改进的成本与后果的概念框架、清单及在线工具。

The cost-effectiveness of quality improvement projects: a conceptual framework, checklist and online tool for considering the costs and consequences of implementation-based quality improvement.

作者信息

Thompson Carl, Pulleyblank Ryan, Parrott Steve, Essex Holly

机构信息

School of Healthcare, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

Department of Health Studies, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;22(1):26-30. doi: 10.1111/jep.12421. Epub 2015 Jul 23.

DOI:10.1111/jep.12421
PMID:26201387
Abstract

In resource constrained systems, decision makers should be concerned with the efficiency of implementing improvement techniques and technologies. Accordingly, they should consider both the costs and effectiveness of implementation as well as the cost-effectiveness of the innovation to be implemented. An approach to doing this effectively is encapsulated in the 'policy cost-effectiveness' approach. This paper outlines some of the theoretical and practical challenges to assessing policy cost-effectiveness (the cost-effectiveness of implementation projects). A checklist and associated (freely available) online application are also presented to help services develop more cost-effective implementation strategies.

摘要

在资源受限的系统中,决策者应关注实施改进技术和工艺的效率。因此,他们应同时考虑实施的成本与效果以及拟实施创新的成本效益。有效做到这一点的一种方法体现在“政策成本效益”方法中。本文概述了评估政策成本效益(实施项目的成本效益)所面临的一些理论和实际挑战。还提供了一份清单及相关的(可免费获取的)在线应用程序,以帮助各服务机构制定更具成本效益的实施策略。

相似文献

1
The cost-effectiveness of quality improvement projects: a conceptual framework, checklist and online tool for considering the costs and consequences of implementation-based quality improvement.质量改进项目的成本效益:一个用于考量基于实施的质量改进的成本与后果的概念框架、清单及在线工具。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Feb;22(1):26-30. doi: 10.1111/jep.12421. Epub 2015 Jul 23.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Cost-Effectiveness and Affordability of Interventions, Policies, and Platforms for the Prevention and Treatment of Mental, Neurological, and Substance Use Disorders预防和治疗精神、神经及物质使用障碍的干预措施、政策和平台的成本效益及可负担性
4
Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields-a systematic literature review.卫生经济评价在实施和改善科学领域的应用——系统文献回顾。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jul 15;14(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0901-7.
5
How to develop cost-conscious guidelines.如何制定注重成本的指南。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(16):1-69. doi: 10.3310/hta5160.
6
Costs and economic evaluations of Quality Improvement Collaboratives in healthcare: a systematic review.医疗保健中质量改进合作的成本和经济评估:系统评价。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 2;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4981-5.
7
Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development.为 NICE 何时应仅在适当设计的证据开发计划背景下推荐使用卫生技术制定决策框架提供信息。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(46):1-323. doi: 10.3310/hta16460.
8
Incorporating considerations of cost-effectiveness, affordability, and resource implications in guideline development: article 6 in Integrating and coordinating efforts in COPD guideline development. An official ATS/ERS workshop report.将成本效益、可负担性和资源影响因素纳入指南制定中:COPD 指南制定中整合和协调工作的第 6 条。美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会官方研讨会报告。
Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2012 Dec;9(5):251-5. doi: 10.1513/pats.201208-059ST.
9
Strategies used for childhood chronic functional constipation: the SUCCESS evidence synthesis.用于儿童慢性功能性便秘的策略:SUCCESS 证据综合。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(5):1-266. doi: 10.3310/PLTR9622.
10
Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement collaborative for obstetric and newborn care in Niger.尼日尔产科和新生儿护理质量改进协作项目的成本效益
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2013;26(3):250-61. doi: 10.1108/09526861311311436.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality in care homes: How wearable devices and social network analysis might help.养老护理机构的服务质量:可穿戴设备和社交网络分析如何提供帮助。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0302478. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302478. eCollection 2024.
2
Development and psychometric evaluation of the Implementation Science Research Project Appraisal Criteria (ImpResPAC) tool: a study protocol.《实施科学研究项目评估标准(ImpResPAC)工具的制定与心理测量学评估:研究方案》。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 16;12(12):e061209. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061209.
3
Economic threshold analysis of delivering a task-sharing treatment for common mental disorders at scale: the Friendship Bench, Zimbabwe.
大规模提供共病心理障碍任务分担治疗的经济阈值分析:津巴布韦的“友谊长凳”。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2022 May;25(2):47-53. doi: 10.1136/ebmental-2021-300317. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
4
Reporting standards, outcomes and costs of quality improvement studies in Ireland: a scoping review.爱尔兰质量改进研究的报告标准、结果和成本:范围综述。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Jul;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001319.
5
Evaluating an enhanced quality improvement intervention in maternity units: PReCePT trial protocol.评估产房产前保健质量改进干预措施的效果:PreCePT 试验方案。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 May;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001204.
6
Clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of individual mental health workers colocated within primary care practices: a systematic literature review.在基层医疗实践中配备个体心理健康工作者的临床效果和成本效益:一项系统文献综述
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 2;10(12):e042052. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042052.
7
The business case for quality improvement.质量改进的商业案例。
J Perinatol. 2020 Jun;40(6):972-979. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-0660-y. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
8
Designing high-quality implementation research: development, application, feasibility and preliminary evaluation of the implementation science research development (ImpRes) tool and guide.设计高质量的实施研究:实施科学研究发展(ImpRes)工具和指南的开发、应用、可行性和初步评估。
Implement Sci. 2019 Aug 14;14(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0897-z.