Jenkins Timothy C, Knepper Bryan C, Jason Moore S, Saveli Carla C, Pawlowski Sean W, Perlman Daniel M, McCollister Bruce D, Burman William J
Department of Medicine, Denver Health, Denver, CO.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Denver Health, Denver, CO.
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;22(8):993-7. doi: 10.1111/acem.12727. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
The incidence of cutaneous abscesses has increased markedly since the emergence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Injection drug use is a risk factor for abscesses and may affect the microbiology and treatment of these infections. In a cohort of patients hospitalized with cutaneous abscesses in the era of CA-MRSA, the objectives were to compare the microbiology of abscesses between injection drug users and non-injection drug users and evaluate antibiotic therapy started in the emergency department (ED) in relation to microbiologic findings and national guideline treatment recommendations.
This was a secondary analysis of two published retrospective cohorts of patients requiring hospitalization for acute bacterial skin infections between January 1, 2007, and May 31, 2012, in seven academic and community hospitals in Colorado. In the subgroup of patients with cutaneous abscesses, microbiologic findings and the antibiotic regimens started in the ED were compared between injection drug users and non-injection drug users. Antibiotic regimens involving multiple agents, lack of activity against MRSA, or an agent with broad Gram-negative activity were classified as discordant with Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guideline treatment recommendations.
Of 323 patients with cutaneous abscesses, 104 (32%) occurred in injection drug users. Among the 235 cases where at least one microorganism was identified by culture, S. aureus was identified less commonly among injection drug users compared with non-injection drug users (55% vs. 75%, p = 0.003), with similar patterns observed for MRSA (33% vs. 47%, p = 0.054) and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (17% vs. 26%, p = 0.11). In contrast to S. aureus, streptococcal species (53% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) and anaerobic organisms (29% vs. 10%, p < 0.001) were identified more commonly among injection drug users. Of 88 injection drug users and 186 non-injection drug users for whom antibiotics were started in the ED, the antibiotic regimens were discordant with IDSA guideline recommendations in 47 (53%) and 101 (54%), respectively (p = 0.89). In cases where MRSA was ultimately identified, the antibiotic regimen started in the ED lacked activity against this pathogen in 14% of cases.
Compared with non-injection drug users, cutaneous abscesses in injection drug users were less likely to involve S. aureus, including MRSA, and more likely to involve streptococci and anaerobes; however, MRSA was common in both groups. Antibiotic regimens started in the ED were discordant with national guidelines in over half of cases and often lacked activity against MRSA when this pathogen was present.
自社区获得性耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(CA-MRSA)出现以来,皮肤脓肿的发病率显著增加。注射吸毒是脓肿的一个危险因素,可能会影响这些感染的微生物学特征及治疗。在CA-MRSA时代,对一组因皮肤脓肿住院的患者进行研究,目的是比较注射吸毒者与非注射吸毒者脓肿的微生物学特征,并评估急诊科(ED)根据微生物学检查结果及国家指南治疗建议开始的抗生素治疗情况。
这是对2007年1月1日至2012年5月31日期间在科罗拉多州七家学术和社区医院因急性细菌性皮肤感染需住院治疗的两个已发表的回顾性队列研究进行的二次分析。在皮肤脓肿患者亚组中,比较注射吸毒者与非注射吸毒者的微生物学检查结果及在急诊科开始的抗生素治疗方案。涉及多种药物、对MRSA无活性或具有广泛革兰氏阴性菌活性的抗生素治疗方案被归类为不符合美国传染病学会(IDSA)指南治疗建议。
在323例皮肤脓肿患者中,104例(32%)发生在注射吸毒者中。在235例通过培养至少鉴定出一种微生物的病例中,与非注射吸毒者相比,注射吸毒者中金黄色葡萄球菌的鉴定率较低(55%对75%,p = 0.003),MRSA(33%对47%,p = 0.054)和甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(17%对26%,p = 0.11)的情况类似。与金黄色葡萄球菌相反,链球菌属(53%对25%,p < 0.001)和厌氧菌(29%对10%,p < 0.001)在注射吸毒者中更常见。在急诊科开始使用抗生素的88例注射吸毒者和186例非注射吸毒者中,抗生素治疗方案分别有47例(53%)和101例(54%)不符合IDSA指南建议(p = 0.89)。在最终鉴定出MRSA的病例中,急诊科开始的抗生素治疗方案在14%的病例中对该病原体无活性。
与非注射吸毒者相比,注射吸毒者的皮肤脓肿较少由金黄色葡萄球菌(包括MRSA)引起,而更可能由链球菌和厌氧菌引起;然而,MRSA在两组中都很常见。急诊科开始的抗生素治疗方案在超过一半的病例中不符合国家指南,并且当存在MRSA病原体时通常对其无活性。