Li H W R, Lam K S L, Tam S, Lee V C Y, Yeung T W Y, Cheung P T, Yeung W S B, Ho P C, Ng E H Y
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Fertility Regulation, The University of Hong Kong Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China
Department of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong.
Hum Reprod. 2015 Sep;30(9):2178-83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev166. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
Should fasting glucose (FG) or an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) be used to screen for dysglycaemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)?
A full OGTT should be recommended as the screening method for dysglycaemia in women with PCOS, regardless of BMI or family history of diabetes mellitus (DM).
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A cross-sectional study on 467 Chinese women diagnosed with PCOS by the Rotterdam criteria between January 2010 to December 2013.
PARTICIPANTS, SETTING, METHODS: The study was done at a university hospital in Hong Kong. All subjects underwent a 75 g OGTT after overnight fasting. We evaluated the performance of FG alone, when compared with the full OGTT, in identifying subjects with dysglycaemia (prediabetes or DM, according to the 2010 diagnostic criteria of the American Diabetes Association).
Of the 467 subjects, 58 (12.4%) had dysglycaemia, among which 46 (9.8%) had prediabetes and 12 (2.6%) had DM, including 4 with known DM. Of the 46 subjects with prediabetes, 25 (54.3%) had normal FG and of the 8 subjects with screened DM in this study, 1 (12.5%) had normal FG. The sensitivity of FG alone in screening for prediabetes, DM and overall dysglycaemia were 45.7, 87.5 and 48.1%, respectively, i.e. missing 54.3% of prediabetes and 12.5% of DM cases as defined by the OGTT. Among the 54 subjects with screened dysglycaemia, 20 (37.0%) had BMI < 25 kg/m(2) and 35 (64.8%) had no family history of DM.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: We only reported on the biochemical diagnosis of DM based on a single time point. In clinical practice, confirmatory results at another time point is required for definitive diagnosis in asymptomatic subjects.
There is an ongoing debate as to whether FG or an OGTT should be used as a screening method for dysglycaemia in women with PCOS. Some guidelines also recommend glucose screening only in those who are overweight and/or having family history of diabetes (DM). There have been scarce data on this issue in the Chinese population, which the current study aims at addressing.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: The study was supported by a research grant from the Hong Kong Obstetrical and Gynaecological Trust Fund, as well as internal research funding of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong. All authors have no competing interests.
多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)女性应采用空腹血糖(FG)还是口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)来筛查血糖异常?
无论体重指数(BMI)或糖尿病(DM)家族史如何,均应推荐完整的OGTT作为PCOS女性血糖异常的筛查方法。
研究设计、规模、持续时间:一项横断面研究,研究对象为2010年1月至2013年12月期间根据鹿特丹标准诊断为PCOS的467名中国女性。
研究对象、地点、方法:研究在香港一家大学医院进行。所有受试者在过夜禁食后接受75g OGTT。我们评估了单独使用FG与完整OGTT相比,在识别血糖异常(根据美国糖尿病协会2010年诊断标准为糖尿病前期或DM)受试者方面的表现。
467名受试者中,58名(12.4%)有血糖异常,其中46名(9.8%)为糖尿病前期,12名(2.6%)为DM,包括4名已知DM患者。46名糖尿病前期受试者中,25名(54.3%)FG正常;本研究中筛查出的8名DM受试者中,1名(12.5%)FG正常。单独使用FG筛查糖尿病前期、DM和总体血糖异常的敏感性分别为45.7%、87.5%和48.1%,即根据OGTT定义,漏诊了54.3%的糖尿病前期病例和12.5%的DM病例。在54名筛查出血糖异常的受试者中,20名(37.0%)BMI<25kg/m²,35名(64.8%)无DM家族史。
局限性、谨慎理由:我们仅报告了基于单个时间点的DM生化诊断。在临床实践中,无症状受试者的确切诊断需要另一个时间点的确认结果。
关于应使用FG还是OGTT作为PCOS女性血糖异常的筛查方法,目前仍存在争议。一些指南还建议仅对超重和/或有糖尿病家族史的女性进行血糖筛查。中国人群中关于这个问题的数据很少,本研究旨在解决这一问题。
研究资金/利益冲突:本研究由香港妇产科信托基金的研究资助以及香港大学妇产科系的内部研究资金支持。所有作者均无利益冲突。