O'Shaughnessy James, Earley Bernadette, Mee John F, Doherty Michael L, Crosson Paul, Barrett Damien, de Waal Theo
Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland ; School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Animal and Bioscience Research Department, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Teagasc, Grange, Dunsany, Co. Meath, Ireland.
Ir Vet J. 2015 Jun 18;68(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13620-015-0038-1. eCollection 2015.
With concerns over the development of anthelmintic resistance in cattle nematode populations, we must re-examine our approach to nematode control in cattle. Targeted selective treatments (TST), whereby individual animals are treated instead of entire groups, are being investigated as an alternative. The study objective was to determine if anthelmintic usage could be reduced using a TST-based approach to nematode control in spring-born suckler beef cattle over their first and second grazing seasons (SGS) without affecting performance. In the first grazing season (FGS), 99 calves with an initial mean (s.d.) calf age and live weight on day 0 (June 28(th) 2012) of 107 (23.1) days and 160 (32.5) kg, respectively, were used. The study commenced on day 0 when calves were randomised and allocated to one of two treatments; 1), standard treatment (control) and 2), TST. Control calves were treated subcutaneously with ivermectin on days 0, 41 and 82 in the FGS. All calves were treated with ivermectin on day 124 and housed on day 133. In the SGS, only heifer calves from the FGS were used and control heifers were treated with ivermectin on day 393. Animals were weighed, blood and faecal sampled every three weeks. The TST animals were treated with ivermectin if thresholds based on a combination of plasma pepsinogen concentrations, faecal egg count and/or the presence of Dictyocaulus viviparus larvae in faeces (FGS only) were reached.
No TST calves reached the treatment threshold criteria in the FGS. The FGS average daily live weight gain (ADG ± s.e.m.) for control and TST group calves was 0.89 ± 0.02 kg and 0.94 ± 0.02 kg day(-1), respectively (P = 0.17). In the SGS, all heifers were treated with ivermectin on day 431 due to clinical signs of respiratory disease. The ADG for control and TST heifers from turnout on day 321 to day 431 was 0.90 ± 0.04 and 0.80 ± 0.04 kg day(-1), respectively (P = 0.03).
Spring-born FGS suckler beef calves require minimal anthelmintic treatment to maintain performance. In contrast, clinical parasitic disease may develop in the SGS unless appropriate anthelmintic treatment is provided.
鉴于对牛线虫种群抗驱虫药发展的担忧,我们必须重新审视牛线虫控制方法。正在研究有针对性的选择性治疗(TST),即对个体动物而非整个群体进行治疗作为替代方法。本研究的目的是确定在春季出生的哺乳肉牛的第一个和第二个放牧季节(SGS)中,采用基于TST的线虫控制方法是否可以减少驱虫药的使用量,同时不影响生产性能。在第一个放牧季节(FGS),使用了99头犊牛,其在2012年6月28日(第0天)的初始平均(标准差)犊牛年龄和活重分别为107(23.1)天和160(32.5)千克。研究于第0天开始,此时犊牛被随机分组并分配到两种处理之一;1)标准处理(对照)和2)TST。对照犊牛在FGS的第0、41和82天皮下注射伊维菌素。所有犊牛在第124天用伊维菌素治疗,并于第133天圈养。在SGS中,仅使用来自FGS的小母牛犊,对照小母牛在第393天用伊维菌素治疗。每三周对动物进行称重、采集血液和粪便样本。如果基于血浆胃蛋白酶原浓度、粪便虫卵计数和/或粪便中胎生网尾线虫幼虫的存在(仅FGS)的组合达到阈值,则对TST动物用伊维菌素治疗。
在FGS中,没有TST犊牛达到治疗阈值标准。对照和TST组犊牛在FGS的平均日增重(ADG±标准误)分别为0.89±0.02千克和0.94±0.02千克/天(P = 0.17)。在SGS中,由于呼吸道疾病的临床症状,所有小母牛在第431天用伊维菌素治疗。从第321天放牧至第431天,对照和TST小母牛的ADG分别为0.90±0.04和0.80±0.04千克/天(P = 0.03)。
春季出生的FGS哺乳肉牛犊牛维持生产性能所需的驱虫药治疗最少。相比之下,除非提供适当的驱虫药治疗,SGS中可能会发生临床寄生虫病。