Quinn Margaret M, Markkanen Pia K, Galligan Catherine J, Sama Susan R, Kriebel David, Gore Rebecca J, Brouillette Natalie M, Okyere Daniel, Sun Chuan, Punnett Laura, Laramie Angela K, Davis Letitia
Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
Occupational Health Surveillance Programme, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Apr;73(4):237-45. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103031. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
In countries with ageing populations, home care (HC) aides are among the fastest growing jobs. There are few quantitative studies of HC occupational safety and health (OSH) conditions. The objectives of this study were to: (1) assess quantitatively the OSH hazards and benefits for a wide range of HC working conditions, and (2) compare OSH experiences of HC aides who are employed via different medical and social services systems in Massachusetts, USA.
HC aides were recruited for a survey via agencies that employ aides and schedule their visits with clients, and through a labour union of aides employed directly by clients or their families. The questionnaire included detailed questions about the most recent HC visits, as well as about individual aides' OSH experiences.
The study population included 1249 HC aides (634 agency-employed, 615 client-employed) contributing information on 3484 HC visits. Hazards occurring most frequently related to musculoskeletal strain, exposure to potentially infectious agents and cleaning chemicals for infection prevention and experience of violence. Client-hired and agency-hired aides had similar OSH experiences with a few exceptions, including use of sharps and experience of verbal violence.
The OSH experience of HC aides is similar to that of aides in institutional healthcare settings. Despite OSH challenges, HC aides enjoy caring for others and the benefits of HC work should be enhanced. Quantification of HC hazards and benefits is useful to prioritise resources for the development of preventive interventions and to provide an evidence base for policy-setting.
在人口老龄化的国家,家庭护理(HC)助手是增长最快的职业之一。关于家庭护理职业安全与健康(OSH)状况的定量研究很少。本研究的目的是:(1)定量评估广泛的家庭护理工作条件下的职业安全与健康危害及益处;(2)比较美国马萨诸塞州通过不同医疗和社会服务系统受雇的家庭护理助手的职业安全与健康经历。
通过雇佣助手并安排其探访客户的机构,以及通过直接受客户或其家人雇佣的助手工会招募家庭护理助手参与调查。问卷包括有关最近家庭护理探访的详细问题,以及关于个体助手职业安全与健康经历的问题。
研究人群包括1249名家庭护理助手(634名由机构雇佣,615名由客户雇佣),他们提供了3484次家庭护理探访的信息。最常发生的危害与肌肉骨骼劳损、接触潜在传染源和用于预防感染的清洁化学品以及暴力经历有关。客户雇佣和机构雇佣的助手职业安全与健康经历相似,但有一些例外,包括锐器使用和言语暴力经历。
家庭护理助手的职业安全与健康经历与机构医疗环境中的助手相似。尽管存在职业安全与健康挑战,但家庭护理助手喜欢照顾他人,应增强家庭护理工作的益处。对家庭护理危害和益处进行量化有助于为预防性干预措施的制定确定资源优先级,并为政策制定提供证据基础。