McCormick Gail L, Shea Katriona, Langkilde Tracy
Department of Biology, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, 208 Mueller Lab, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA; The Center for Brain, Behavior and Cognition, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Department of Biology, Intercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, 208 Mueller Lab, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015 Oct 1;222:81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.07.008. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
Stress is typically characterized as "acute" (lasting from minutes to hours) or "chronic" (lasting from days to months). These terms are of limited use as they are inconsistently used and only encompass one aspect of the stressor (duration). Short and long duration stress are generally thought to produce specific outcomes (e.g. acute stress enhances while chronic stress suppresses immune function). We propose that aspects of stress other than duration, such as frequency and intensity, are important in determining its outcome. We experimentally manipulated duration, frequency, and intensity of application of exogenous corticosterone, CORT, in Sceloporus undulatus (Eastern fence lizards) and measured the immune outcomes. Our findings reveal that immune outcomes of stress are not easily predicted from the average amount or duration of CORT elevation, but that intensity plays an important role. Although three of our treatments received the same average amount of CORT, they produced different effects on immune outcomes (hemagglutination). As predicted by the literature, short-duration exposure to low-dose CORT enhanced hemagglutination; however, short-duration exposure to high-dose CORT suppressed hemagglutination, suggesting that stressor intensity affects immune outcomes of stress. While both are traditionally termed "acute" based on duration, these treatments produced different immune outcomes. Long-duration ("chronic") exposure to CORT did not produce the expected suppression of hemagglutination. Frequency of CORT application did not alter immune outcomes at low intensities. These results highlight the need to quantify more than just the duration of a stressor if we are to understand and manage the ecological consequences of stress. Specifically, we should consider stressor frequency and intensity, as well as duration, for a more complete characterization and understanding of stress.
压力通常被分为“急性”(持续数分钟至数小时)或“慢性”(持续数天至数月)。这些术语的用途有限,因为它们的使用并不一致,且仅涵盖了压力源的一个方面(持续时间)。一般认为,短期和长期压力会产生特定的结果(例如,急性压力会增强免疫功能,而慢性压力会抑制免疫功能)。我们认为,除持续时间外,压力的其他方面,如频率和强度,在决定其结果方面也很重要。我们通过实验操纵了东部围栏蜥蜴(Sceloporus undulatus)体内外源性皮质酮(CORT)的施用持续时间、频率和强度,并测量了免疫结果。我们的研究结果表明,不能仅根据CORT升高的平均量或持续时间轻易预测压力的免疫结果,强度起着重要作用。虽然我们的三种处理接受了相同的平均CORT量,但它们对免疫结果(血凝反应)产生了不同的影响。正如文献所预测的,短期低剂量CORT暴露增强了血凝反应;然而,短期高剂量CORT暴露则抑制了血凝反应,这表明压力源强度会影响压力的免疫结果。虽然根据持续时间这两种情况传统上都被称为“急性”,但这些处理产生了不同的免疫结果。长期(“慢性”)CORT暴露并未产生预期的血凝抑制作用。在低强度下,CORT的施用频率并未改变免疫结果。这些结果凸显出,如果我们要理解和管理压力的生态后果,就需要对压力源进行多方面的量化,而不仅仅是持续时间。具体而言,我们应该考虑压力源的频率、强度以及持续时间,以便更全面地描述和理解压力。