Department of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA.
Department of Biosciences, University of Exeter, Penryn Campus, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
Ecol Lett. 2021 Apr;24(4):687-697. doi: 10.1111/ele.13685. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
Disturbance is a key factor shaping ecological communities, but little is understood about how the effects of disturbance processes accumulate over time. When disturbance regimes change, historical processes may influence future community structure, for example, by altering invasibility compared to communities with stable regimes. Here, we use an annual plant model to investigate how the history of disturbance alters invasion success. In particular, we show how two communities can have different outcomes from species introduction, solely due to past differences in disturbance regimes that generated different biotic legacies. We demonstrate that historical differences can enhance or suppress the persistence of introduced species, and that biotic legacies generated by stable disturbance history decay over time, though legacies can persist for unexpectedly long durations. This establishes a formal theoretical foundation for disturbance legacies having profound effects on communities, and highlights the value of further research on the biotic legacies of disturbance.
干扰是塑造生态群落的关键因素,但人们对干扰过程的影响如何随时间积累知之甚少。当干扰机制发生变化时,历史过程可能会影响未来的群落结构,例如,与稳定机制的群落相比,通过改变可入侵性来影响。在这里,我们使用一年生植物模型来研究干扰历史如何改变入侵成功。具体来说,我们展示了两个群落如何仅由于过去干扰机制的差异导致不同的生物遗产,从而对物种引入产生不同的结果。我们证明了历史差异可以增强或抑制引入物种的持久性,并且稳定干扰历史产生的生物遗产会随着时间的流逝而衰减,尽管遗产可能会持续很长时间。这为干扰的生物遗产对群落产生深远影响建立了正式的理论基础,并强调了进一步研究干扰的生物遗产的价值。