• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Emergence times and airway reactions in general laryngeal mask airway anesthesia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.普通喉罩气道麻醉中的苏醒时间和气道反应:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Jul 26;16:316. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0855-2.
2
Airway reactions and emergence times in general laryngeal mask airway anaesthesia: a meta-analysis.普通喉罩气道麻醉中的气道反应和苏醒时间:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):106-16. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000183.
3
Emergence times and airway reactions during general anaesthesia with remifentanil and a laryngeal mask airway: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.瑞芬太尼和喉罩全身麻醉时的出现时间和气道反应:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):588-597. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000852.
4
Desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia: the effect on early versus late recovery and perioperative coughing.地氟烷与七氟烷用于门诊麻醉维持:对早期与晚期恢复及围手术期咳嗽的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):387-93. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc21a.
5
The effect of sevoflurane versus desflurane on the incidence of upper respiratory morbidity in patients undergoing general anesthesia with a Laryngeal Mask Airway: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.七氟醚与地氟醚对全身麻醉下使用喉罩通气患者上呼吸道发病率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2013 Sep;25(6):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
6
Desflurane/fentanyl compared with sevoflurane/fentanyl on awakening and quality of recovery in outpatient surgery using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.在门诊手术中使用喉罩气道时,地氟烷/芬太尼与七氟烷/芬太尼对苏醒及恢复质量的比较:一项随机双盲对照试验
J Clin Anesth. 2013 Dec;25(8):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
7
Desflurane versus sevoflurane in pediatric anesthesia with a laryngeal mask airway: A randomized controlled trial.小儿喉罩气道麻醉中地氟烷与七氟烷的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Sep;96(35):e7977. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007977.
8
Desflurane is not inferior to sevoflurane in the occurrence of adverse respiratory events during laryngeal mask airway anesthesia: a non-inferiority randomized double-blinded controlled study.地氟醚在喉罩麻醉期间发生不良呼吸事件方面并不劣于七氟醚:一项非劣效性随机双盲对照研究。
Minerva Anestesiol. 2020 Jun;86(6):608-616. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.20.14202-0. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Statistical analysis methods for meta-analysis of times to emergence.苏醒时间荟萃分析的统计分析方法
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):506. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000254.
10
Reply to: Statistical analysis methods for meta-analysis of times to emergence.回复:苏醒时间荟萃分析的统计分析方法。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):506-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000253.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergence times and airway reactions during general anaesthesia with remifentanil and a laryngeal mask airway: A multicentre randomised controlled trial.瑞芬太尼和喉罩全身麻醉时的出现时间和气道反应:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Aug;35(8):588-597. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000852.
2
Desflurane for ambulatory anaesthesia: A comparison with sevoflurane for recovery profile and airway responses.用于门诊麻醉的地氟烷:与七氟烷在恢复情况和气道反应方面的比较。
Indian J Anaesth. 2017 Apr;61(4):315-320. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_513_16.

本文引用的文献

1
Airway reactions and emergence times in general laryngeal mask airway anaesthesia: a meta-analysis.普通喉罩气道麻醉中的气道反应和苏醒时间:一项荟萃分析。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):106-16. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000183.
2
When may systematic reviews and meta-analyses be considered reliable?何时可以认为系统评价和荟萃分析是可靠的?
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):85-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000186.
3
Desflurane/fentanyl compared with sevoflurane/fentanyl on awakening and quality of recovery in outpatient surgery using a laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, double-blinded controlled trial.在门诊手术中使用喉罩气道时,地氟烷/芬太尼与七氟烷/芬太尼对苏醒及恢复质量的比较:一项随机双盲对照试验
J Clin Anesth. 2013 Dec;25(8):651-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.07.006. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
4
The effect of sevoflurane versus desflurane on the incidence of upper respiratory morbidity in patients undergoing general anesthesia with a Laryngeal Mask Airway: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.七氟醚与地氟醚对全身麻醉下使用喉罩通气患者上呼吸道发病率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2013 Sep;25(6):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Aug 17.
5
Desflurane: a clinical update of a third-generation inhaled anaesthetic.地氟醚:第三代吸入麻醉剂的临床新进展。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2012 Apr;56(4):420-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02600.x. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
6
Laryngeal mask airways have a lower risk of airway complications compared with endotracheal intubation: a systematic review.与气管插管相比,喉罩气道发生气道并发症的风险较低:一项系统评价。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Oct;68(10):2359-76. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.04.017. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
7
Development and feasibility of a scale to assess postoperative recovery: the post-operative quality recovery scale.术后恢复评估量表的制定及可行性研究:术后质量恢复量表。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):892-905. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181d960a9.
8
[Incidence of cough after desflurane and sevoflurane administration through a laryngeal mask: a controlled clinical trial].通过喉罩给予地氟烷和七氟烷后咳嗽的发生率:一项对照临床试验
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2010 Mar;57(3):141-6. doi: 10.1016/s0034-9356(10)70188-2.
9
Desflurane versus sevoflurane for maintenance of outpatient anesthesia: the effect on early versus late recovery and perioperative coughing.地氟烷与七氟烷用于门诊麻醉维持:对早期与晚期恢复及围手术期咳嗽的影响。
Anesth Analg. 2009 Aug;109(2):387-93. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181adc21a.
10
Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.疼痛:三种常用疼痛评定量表综述
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Aug;14(7):798-804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.

普通喉罩气道麻醉中的苏醒时间和气道反应:一项随机对照试验的研究方案

Emergence times and airway reactions in general laryngeal mask airway anesthesia: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Stevanovic Ana, Rossaint Rolf, Keszei András P, Fritz Harald, Fröba Gebhard, Pühringer Friedrich, Coburn Mark

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

Department of Medical Informatics, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

Trials. 2015 Jul 26;16:316. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0855-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-015-0855-2
PMID:26210907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4515321/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in appropriate patients supports fast-track anesthesia with a lower incidence of postoperative airway-connected adverse events. Data on the most favorable anesthetic in this context, with the lowest rate of upper airway complications and fast emergence times, are controversial and limited. Desflurane seems to match these criteria best, but large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a standardized study protocol are lacking. Therefore, we aim to compare desflurane with other commonly used anesthetics, sevoflurane and propofol, in a sufficiently powered RCT. We hypothesize that desflurane is noninferior regarding the frequency of upper airway events and superior regarding the emergence times to sevoflurane and propofol.

METHODS/DESIGN: A total of 351 patients undergoing surgery with an LMA will be included in this prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled, multicenter clinical trial. The patients will be randomly assigned to the three treatment arms: desflurane (n = 117), sevoflurane (n = 117), and propofol (n = 117). The emergence time (time to state the date of birth) will be the primary endpoint of this study. The secondary endpoints include further emergence times, such as time to open eyes, to remove LMA, to respond to command and to state name. Additionally, we will determine the frequency of cough and laryngospasm, measured intraoperatively and at emergence. We will assess the postoperative recovery on the first postoperative day via the Postoperative Quality Recovery Scale.

DISCUSSION

Despite increasing importance of cost-effective and safe anesthesia application, we lack proof for the most advantageous anesthetic agent, when an LMA is used. There are only a few RCTs comparing desflurane to other commonly used anesthetics (sevoflurane, propofol and isoflurane) in patients with LMA. These RCTs were conducted with small sample sizes, huge interstudy variability, and some also showed strong biases. The present multicenter RCT will provide results from a large sample size with a standardized study protocol and minimized bias, which is feasible in the clinical routine. Furthermore, we will expand our knowledge regarding the most favorable recovery on the first postoperative day, which impacts patients' comfort after surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT Identifier: 2014-003810-96, 5 September 2014 ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02322502, December 2014.

摘要

背景

在合适的患者中使用喉罩气道(LMA)有助于实现快速麻醉,且术后气道相关不良事件的发生率较低。关于在此背景下最有利的麻醉药物,即上呼吸道并发症发生率最低且苏醒时间快的数据存在争议且有限。地氟醚似乎最符合这些标准,但缺乏采用标准化研究方案的大型随机对照试验(RCT)。因此,我们旨在通过一项有足够效力的RCT,比较地氟醚与其他常用麻醉药物七氟醚和丙泊酚。我们假设在地氟醚组上呼吸道事件的发生率不低于其他两组,且在苏醒时间方面优于七氟醚和丙泊酚组。

方法/设计:本前瞻性、随机、双盲对照、多中心临床试验将纳入总共351例使用LMA进行手术的患者。患者将被随机分配至三个治疗组:地氟醚组(n = 117)、七氟醚组(n = 117)和丙泊酚组(n = 117)。苏醒时间(说出出生日期的时间)将作为本研究的主要终点。次要终点包括进一步的苏醒时间,如睁眼时间、拔除LMA时间、对指令做出反应时间和说出姓名时间。此外,我们将确定术中及苏醒时咳嗽和喉痉挛的发生率。我们将通过术后质量恢复量表评估术后第一天的恢复情况。

讨论

尽管具有成本效益和安全的麻醉应用的重要性日益增加,但当使用LMA时,我们仍缺乏关于最有利麻醉药物的证据。仅有少数RCT在使用LMA的患者中比较了地氟醚与其他常用麻醉药物(七氟醚、丙泊酚和异氟醚)。这些RCT样本量小,研究间变异性大,且一些还存在严重偏倚。本多中心RCT将提供来自大样本量、采用标准化研究方案且偏倚最小的结果,这在临床常规中是可行的。此外,我们将扩展关于术后第一天最有利恢复情况的知识,这会影响患者术后的舒适度。

试验注册

欧盟临床试验数据库标识符:2014 - 003810 - 96,2014年9月5日;美国国立医学图书馆临床试验注册中心:NCT02322502,2014年12月。