Suppr超能文献

世界各地头孢菌素和氨基糖苷类药物的使用情况。

Cephalosporin and aminoglycoside utilization in different parts of the world.

作者信息

Kumana C R, Li K Y, Kou M, Chan S C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Dec;24(6):1001-10. doi: 10.1093/jac/24.6.1001.

Abstract

Cephalosporin and aminoglycoside utilization in Hong Kong during 1984, 1985 and 1986, were evaluated from wholesale data and compared with corresponding Swedish statistics and with UK data from a survey of non-hospital prescriptions. Details regarding each drug and category were collated, adjusted for population and if appropriate expressed as defined daily doses (DDDs)/1000 inhabitants/day. With respect to cephalosporins: (a) overall sales (especially those of the newer and more expensive parenteral drugs) were increasing; (b) parenteral sales were much larger in Hong Kong hospitals than in the community (up to about 106 versus 16 kg/million inhabitants/year respectively), but in Sweden they were comparable (up to about 38 and 41 kg/million inhabitants/year respectively); (c) non-hospital oral utilization appeared greater in the UK than in Sweden and Hong Kong (up to about 0.7, 0.4 and 0.4 DDDs/1000 inhabitants/day respectively); (d) oral sales to hospitals were greater in Hong Kong than Sweden (up to 0.3 compared to 0.1 DDDs/1000 inhabitants/day respectively) and (e) oral paediatric formulations (liquids) were most popular in Hong Kong, a higher proportion of children in Hong Kong being one possible reason. Non-hospital sales of gentamicin and kanamycin in Hong Kong were much greater than in Sweden (up to about 0.20 and 0.06 vs. 0.01 and 0.00 DDDs/1000 inhabitants/day respectively), whereas UK utilization appeared almost non-existent. Topical neomycin sales in Hong Kong were much more popular than in Sweden (up to about 60 vs. 9 g/million inhabitants/day). These regional differences in antibiotic utilization may be related to respective health care systems (and thus the affordability and availability of drugs) and prescribing preferences (cultural and/or promoted by drug companies), quite apart from possible differences in drug efficacy, drug tolerance and the prevalence and severity of various infections.

摘要

利用批发数据评估了1984年、1985年和1986年香港头孢菌素和氨基糖苷类药物的使用情况,并与瑞典的相应统计数据以及英国非医院处方调查数据进行了比较。整理了每种药物和类别相关的详细信息,根据人口进行了调整,并在适当情况下以限定日剂量(DDD)/1000居民/天表示。关于头孢菌素:(a)总体销售额(尤其是较新且更昂贵的注射用药物)在增加;(b)香港医院的注射用销售额远高于社区(分别高达约106和16千克/百万居民/年),但在瑞典两者相当(分别高达约38和41千克/百万居民/年);(c)英国非医院口服使用率似乎高于瑞典和香港(分别高达约0.7、0.4和0.4 DDD/1000居民/天);(d)香港医院的口服销售额高于瑞典(分别高达0.3和0.1 DDD/1000居民/天);(e)口服儿科制剂(液体)在香港最受欢迎,香港儿童比例较高可能是一个原因。香港庆大霉素和卡那霉素的非医院销售额远高于瑞典(分别高达约0.20和0.06,而瑞典为0.01和0.00 DDD/1000居民/天),而英国的使用率几乎不存在。香港新霉素局部用药的销售额比瑞典更受欢迎(分别高达约60和9克/百万居民/天)。抗生素使用的这些地区差异可能与各自的医疗保健系统(以及药物的可承受性和可获得性)和处方偏好(文化因素和/或制药公司的推广)有关,这与药物疗效、药物耐受性以及各种感染的患病率和严重程度的可能差异无关。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验