• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

围手术期目标导向液体治疗对择期结直肠癌切除术临床结局的影响

[Effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy on clinical outcome in elective colorectal resection].

作者信息

Lin Qiang, Zhou Huodong, Li Dafeng, Ye Jinfeng, Hong Jinfu, Hu Yemao

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yangjiang Hospital, Guangdong Yangjiang 529500, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jul;18(7):671-5.

PMID:26211769
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on clinical outcomes in elective colorectal resection.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between March 2013 and December 2014 were recruited prospectively. GDFT was administrated based on corrected left ventricular ejection time and stroke volume using the esophageal Doppler monitoring. These patients were compared with a historical cohort of 58 patients managed without GDFT from January 2012 to February 2013. The primary endpoint was postoperative hospital stay and complication rate.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the overall fluid volumes administered intraoperatively between two groups [(2657±1037) ml vs. (2846±1444) ml, P>0.05], but patients in GDFT group received higher volume of colloid fluids [(935±556) ml vs. (688±414) ml, P<0.05]. After a period of concordance at the start of operation, corrected left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume and cardiac index increased in GDFT group compared with control group (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in postoperative hospital stay [(11.27±6.42) d vs. (12.04±7.18) d, P>0.05] and total complication rate (26.5% vs. 25.9%, P>0.05) between two groups, but GDFT group had earlier postoperative flatus [(3.52±0.84) d vs. (4.48±0.71) d, P<0.05] and faster tolerated diet [(5.92±1.18) d vs. (6.83±0.95) d, P<0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection do not benefit from intraoperative GDFT. Further studies should be carried out to investigate whether GDFT can be routinely used during colorectal resection.

摘要

目的

评估围手术期目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)对择期结直肠切除术临床结局的影响。

方法

前瞻性纳入2013年3月至2014年12月期间接受择期结直肠切除术的42例患者。使用食管多普勒监测,根据校正后的左心室射血时间和每搏量进行GDFT。将这些患者与2012年1月至2013年2月期间未接受GDFT治疗的58例患者的历史队列进行比较。主要终点是术后住院时间和并发症发生率。

结果

两组术中输注的总体液体量无显著差异[(2657±1037)ml对(2846±1444)ml,P>0.05],但GDFT组患者接受的胶体液量更高[(935±556)ml对(688±414)ml,P<0.05]。在手术开始时达到一致状态一段时间后,GDFT组校正后的左心室射血时间、每搏量和心脏指数较对照组增加(均P<0.05)。两组术后住院时间[(11.27±6.42)天对(12.04±7.18)天,P>0.05]和总并发症发生率(26.5%对25.9%,P>0.05)无显著差异,但GDFT组术后排气更早[(3.52±0.84)天对(4.48±0.71)天,P<0.05],饮食耐受恢复更快[(5.92±1.18)天对(6.83±0.95)天,P<0.05]。

结论

接受择期结直肠切除术的患者未从术中GDFT中获益。应开展进一步研究以调查GDFT在结直肠切除术中是否可常规使用。

相似文献

1
[Effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy on clinical outcome in elective colorectal resection].围手术期目标导向液体治疗对择期结直肠癌切除术临床结局的影响
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jul;18(7):671-5.
2
Goal-directed fluid therapy in major elective rectal surgery.目标导向的液体治疗在大型择期直肠手术中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014 Dec;12(12):1467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
3
Randomized clinical trial of goal-directed fluid therapy within an enhanced recovery protocol for elective colectomy.择期结肠切除术强化康复方案中目标导向液体治疗的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2013 Jan;100(1):66-74. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8940. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
4
A prospective comparison of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor versus esophageal Doppler monitor for goal-directed fluid therapy in colorectal surgery patients.一项针对非侵入性心输出量监测仪与食道多普勒监测仪在结直肠手术患者目标导向性液体治疗中应用的前瞻性比较。
Anesth Analg. 2014 May;118(5):966-75. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000182.
5
Meta-analysis of goal-directed fluid therapy using transoesophageal Doppler monitoring in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.经食管多普勒监测指导下目标导向液体治疗在择期结直肠手术患者中的荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2019 Jul 4;3(5):606-616. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50188. eCollection 2019 Oct.
6
Implementation of closed-loop-assisted intra-operative goal-directed fluid therapy during major abdominal surgery: A case-control study with propensity matching.闭环辅助术中目标导向液体治疗在大型腹部手术中的应用:一项倾向评分匹配的病例对照研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2018 Sep;35(9):650-658. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000827.
7
Goal-directed fluid therapy versus conventional fluid therapy in colorectal surgery: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.目标导向液体治疗与传统液体治疗在结直肠手术中的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2018 Aug;56:264-273. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.06.034. Epub 2018 Jul 1.
8
Effect of Goal-Directed Intraoperative Fluid Therapy on Duration of Hospital Stay and Postoperative Complications in Patients Undergoing Excision of Large Supratentorial Tumors.目标导向术中液体治疗对接受大型幕上肿瘤切除术患者的住院时间和术后并发症的影响。
Neurol India. 2022 Jan-Feb;70(1):108-114. doi: 10.4103/0028-3886.336329.
9
Impact of a goal directed fluid therapy algorithm on postoperative morbidity in patients undergoing open right hepatectomy: a single centre retrospective observational study.目标导向液体治疗算法对接受开腹右半肝切除术患者术后发病率的影响:单中心回顾性观察研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0803-x.
10
Doppler-guided goal-directed fluid therapy does not affect intestinal cell damage but increases global gastrointestinal perfusion in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.多普勒引导的目标导向液体治疗不会影响肠道细胞损伤,但会增加结直肠手术中的全胃肠道灌注:一项随机对照试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Dec;19(12):1081-1091. doi: 10.1111/codi.13923.

引用本文的文献

1
Meta-analysis of goal-directed fluid therapy using transoesophageal Doppler monitoring in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.经食管多普勒监测指导下目标导向液体治疗在择期结直肠手术患者中的荟萃分析。
BJS Open. 2019 Jul 4;3(5):606-616. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50188. eCollection 2019 Oct.