Suppr超能文献

围手术期目标导向液体治疗对择期结直肠癌切除术临床结局的影响

[Effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy on clinical outcome in elective colorectal resection].

作者信息

Lin Qiang, Zhou Huodong, Li Dafeng, Ye Jinfeng, Hong Jinfu, Hu Yemao

机构信息

Department of Colorectal Surgery, Yangjiang Hospital, Guangdong Yangjiang 529500, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2015 Jul;18(7):671-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of perioperative goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) on clinical outcomes in elective colorectal resection.

METHODS

A total of 42 patients undergoing elective colorectal resection between March 2013 and December 2014 were recruited prospectively. GDFT was administrated based on corrected left ventricular ejection time and stroke volume using the esophageal Doppler monitoring. These patients were compared with a historical cohort of 58 patients managed without GDFT from January 2012 to February 2013. The primary endpoint was postoperative hospital stay and complication rate.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the overall fluid volumes administered intraoperatively between two groups [(2657±1037) ml vs. (2846±1444) ml, P>0.05], but patients in GDFT group received higher volume of colloid fluids [(935±556) ml vs. (688±414) ml, P<0.05]. After a period of concordance at the start of operation, corrected left ventricular ejection time, stroke volume and cardiac index increased in GDFT group compared with control group (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in postoperative hospital stay [(11.27±6.42) d vs. (12.04±7.18) d, P>0.05] and total complication rate (26.5% vs. 25.9%, P>0.05) between two groups, but GDFT group had earlier postoperative flatus [(3.52±0.84) d vs. (4.48±0.71) d, P<0.05] and faster tolerated diet [(5.92±1.18) d vs. (6.83±0.95) d, P<0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing elective colorectal resection do not benefit from intraoperative GDFT. Further studies should be carried out to investigate whether GDFT can be routinely used during colorectal resection.

摘要

目的

评估围手术期目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)对择期结直肠切除术临床结局的影响。

方法

前瞻性纳入2013年3月至2014年12月期间接受择期结直肠切除术的42例患者。使用食管多普勒监测,根据校正后的左心室射血时间和每搏量进行GDFT。将这些患者与2012年1月至2013年2月期间未接受GDFT治疗的58例患者的历史队列进行比较。主要终点是术后住院时间和并发症发生率。

结果

两组术中输注的总体液体量无显著差异[(2657±1037)ml对(2846±1444)ml,P>0.05],但GDFT组患者接受的胶体液量更高[(935±556)ml对(688±414)ml,P<0.05]。在手术开始时达到一致状态一段时间后,GDFT组校正后的左心室射血时间、每搏量和心脏指数较对照组增加(均P<0.05)。两组术后住院时间[(11.27±6.42)天对(12.04±7.18)天,P>0.05]和总并发症发生率(26.5%对25.9%,P>0.05)无显著差异,但GDFT组术后排气更早[(3.52±0.84)天对(4.48±0.71)天,P<0.05],饮食耐受恢复更快[(5.92±1.18)天对(6.83±0.95)天,P<0.05]。

结论

接受择期结直肠切除术的患者未从术中GDFT中获益。应开展进一步研究以调查GDFT在结直肠切除术中是否可常规使用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验