Suppr超能文献

阿片类药物替代疗法对刑满释放人员降低阿片类药物依赖史者死亡率的成本效益分析。

A cost-effectiveness analysis of opioid substitution therapy upon prison release in reducing mortality among people with a history of opioid dependence.

作者信息

Gisev Natasa, Shanahan Marian, Weatherburn Don J, Mattick Richard P, Larney Sarah, Burns Lucy, Degenhardt Louisa

机构信息

National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research (BOCSAR), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 2015 Dec;110(12):1975-84. doi: 10.1111/add.13073. Epub 2015 Sep 23.

Abstract

AIM

Although opioid substitution therapy (OST) immediately after prison release reduces mortality, the cost-effectiveness of treatment has not been examined. Therefore, we undertook a cost-effectiveness analysis of OST treatment upon prison release and the prevention of death in the first 6 months post-release.

DESIGN

Population-based, retrospective data linkage study using records of OST entrants (1985-2010), charges and court appearances (1993-2011), prison episodes (2000-11) and death notifications (1985-2011).

SETTING

New South Wales, Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 16,073 people with a history of opioid dependence released from prison for the first time between 1 January 2000 and 30 June 2011.

INTERVENTION

OST treatment compared to no OST treatment at prison release.

MEASUREMENTS

Mortality and costs (treatment, criminal justice system-court, penalties, prison-and the social costs of crime) were evaluated at 6 months post-release. Analyses included propensity score matching, bootstrapping and regression.

FINDINGS

A total of 13,468 individuals were matched (6734 in each group). Twenty (0.3%) people released onto OST died, compared with 46 people (0.7%) not released onto OST. The final average costs were lower for the group that received OST post-release ($7206 versus $14,356). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio showed that OST post-release was dominant, incurring lower costs and saving more lives. The probability that OST post-release is cost-effective per life-year saved is 96.7% at a willingness to pay of $500.

CONCLUSION

Opioid substitution treatment (compared with no such treatment), given on release from prison to people with a history of opioid dependence, is cost-effective in reducing mortality in the first 6 months of release.

摘要

目的

虽然出狱后立即进行阿片类药物替代疗法(OST)可降低死亡率,但该治疗的成本效益尚未得到研究。因此,我们对出狱后进行OST治疗以及预防释放后前6个月内死亡的情况进行了成本效益分析。

设计

基于人群的回顾性数据关联研究,使用OST参与者记录(1985 - 2010年)、收费及出庭记录(1993 - 2011年)、监禁记录(2000 - 11年)和死亡通知(1985 - 2011年)。

地点

澳大利亚新南威尔士州。

参与者

2000年1月1日至2011年6月30日期间首次从监狱释放的16,073名有阿片类药物依赖史的人群。

干预措施

将出狱时接受OST治疗与未接受OST治疗进行比较。

测量指标

在释放后6个月评估死亡率和成本(治疗、刑事司法系统 - 法庭、处罚、监禁以及犯罪的社会成本)。分析包括倾向得分匹配、自抽样法和回归分析。

研究结果

共匹配了13,468人(每组6734人)。接受OST治疗的释放者中有20人(0.3%)死亡,未接受OST治疗的有46人(0.7%)死亡。释放后接受OST治疗组的最终平均成本较低(7206美元对14,356美元)。增量成本效益比表明,释放后进行OST治疗具有优势,成本更低且挽救了更多生命。在支付意愿为500美元时,释放后进行OST治疗每挽救一个生命年具有成本效益的概率为96.7%。

结论

对于有阿片类药物依赖史的人,出狱时给予阿片类药物替代治疗(与不进行此类治疗相比)在降低释放后前6个月的死亡率方面具有成本效益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验