Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.
Addiction. 2022 Feb;117(2):382-391. doi: 10.1111/add.15627. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
Opioid agonist treatment is effective but resource intensive to administer safely in custodial settings, leading to significant under-treatment of opioid dependence in these settings world-wide. This study assessed the safety of subcutaneous slow-release depot buprenorphine in custody.
Open-label, non-randomized trial.
Correctional centres in New South Wales, Australia.
Sixty-seven men and women, aged ≥ 18 years of various security classifications with a diagnosis of moderate to severe DSM-5 opioid use disorder currently serving a custodial sentence of ≥ 6 months were recruited between November 2018 and July 2019. Patients not in opioid agonist treatment at recruitment commenced depot buprenorphine; patients already stable on oral methadone treatment were recruited to the comparison arm.
Depot buprenorphine (CAM2038 weekly for 4 weeks then monthly) and daily oral methadone.
Safety was assessed by adverse event (AE) monitoring and physical examinations at every visit. Participants were administered a survey assessing self-reported diversion and substance use at baseline and weeks 4 and 16.
Retention in depot buprenorphine treatment was 92.3%. Ninety-four per cent of patients reported at least one adverse event, typically mild and transient. No diversion was identified. The prevalence of self-reported non-prescribed opioid use among depot buprenorphine patients decreased significantly between baseline (97%) and week 16 (12%, odds ratio = 0.0035, 95% confidence interval = 0.0007-0.018, P < 0.0001).
This first study of depot buprenorphine in custodial settings showed treatment retention and outcomes comparable to those observed in community settings and for other opioid agonist treatment used in custodial settings, without increased risk of diversion.
阿片类激动剂治疗虽然有效,但在羁押场所安全实施需要大量资源,导致全世界这些场所的阿片类药物依赖治疗严重不足。本研究评估了在羁押场所使用皮下慢释放丁丙诺啡的安全性。
开放性、非随机试验。
澳大利亚新南威尔士州的惩教中心。
共招募了 67 名年龄≥18 岁的男性和女性,他们的安全分类各不相同,均有 DSM-5 中度至重度阿片类药物使用障碍的诊断,目前正在服至少 6 个月的监禁刑期。招募时未接受阿片类激动剂治疗的患者开始接受丁丙诺啡皮下注射;已经稳定服用口服美沙酮治疗的患者被招募到对照组。
丁丙诺啡(CAM2038 每周 1 次,共 4 周,然后每月 1 次)和每日口服美沙酮。
通过每次就诊时的不良事件(AE)监测和体格检查评估安全性。参与者在基线和第 4 周和第 16 周接受了一项评估自我报告的转用和物质使用的调查。
丁丙诺啡皮下注射治疗的保留率为 92.3%。94%的患者报告了至少一次不良事件,通常为轻度和短暂的。没有发现转用。与基线时(97%)相比,丁丙诺啡患者自我报告的非处方阿片类药物使用的比例在第 16 周显著下降(12%,优势比=0.0035,95%置信区间=0.0007-0.018,P<0.0001)。
这是在羁押场所首次研究丁丙诺啡,结果显示治疗保留率和结果与社区环境以及在羁押场所使用的其他阿片类激动剂治疗相当,且没有增加转用的风险。