Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤住院康复中的患者努力程度:病程及其与年龄、脑损伤严重程度和受伤后时间的关联

Patient Effort in Traumatic Brain Injury Inpatient Rehabilitation: Course and Associations With Age, Brain Injury Severity, and Time Postinjury.

作者信息

Seel Ronald T, Corrigan John D, Dijkers Marcel P, Barrett Ryan S, Bogner Jennifer, Smout Randall J, Garmoe William, Horn Susan D

机构信息

Crawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.027.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe patients' level of effort in occupational, physical, and speech therapy sessions during traumatic brain injury (TBI) inpatient rehabilitation and to evaluate how age, injury severity, cognitive impairment, and time are associated with effort.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Acute TBI rehabilitation programs.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients (N=1946) receiving 138,555 therapy sessions.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Effort in rehabilitation sessions rated on the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale, FIM, Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score, posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), and Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS).

RESULTS

The Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale effort ratings in individual therapy sessions closely conformed to a normative distribution for all 3 disciplines. Mean Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale ratings for patients' therapy sessions were higher in the discharge week than in the admission week (P<.001). For patients who completed 2, 3, or 4 weeks of rehabilitation, differences in effort ratings (P<.001) were observed between 5 subgroups stratified by admission FIM cognitive scores and over time. In linear mixed-effects modeling, age and Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score at admission, days from injury to rehabilitation admission, days from admission, and daily ratings of PTA and ABS score were predictors of level of effort (P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients' level of effort can be observed and reliably rated in the TBI inpatient rehabilitation setting using the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale. Patients who sustain TBI show varying levels of effort in rehabilitation therapy sessions, with effort tending to increase over the stay. PTA and agitated behavior are primary risk factors that substantially reduce patient effort in therapies.

摘要

目的

描述创伤性脑损伤(TBI)住院康复期间患者在职业、物理和言语治疗课程中的努力程度,并评估年龄、损伤严重程度、认知障碍和时间与努力程度之间的关联。

设计

前瞻性、多中心、纵向队列研究。

设置

急性TBI康复项目。

参与者

接受138,555次治疗课程的患者(N = 1946)。

干预措施

不适用。

主要结局指标

根据治疗强度康复量表、FIM、综合严重程度指数脑损伤严重程度评分、创伤后遗忘(PTA)和激越行为量表(ABS)对康复课程中的努力程度进行评分。

结果

在所有3个学科中,个体治疗课程的治疗强度康复量表努力程度评分都紧密符合正态分布。患者治疗课程的平均治疗强度康复量表评分在出院周高于入院周(P <.001)。对于完成2、3或4周康复的患者,在按入院FIM认知评分分层的5个亚组之间以及随着时间推移,努力程度评分存在差异(P <.001)。在线性混合效应模型中,入院时的年龄和综合严重程度指数脑损伤严重程度评分、从受伤到康复入院的天数、入院天数以及PTA和ABS评分的每日评分是努力程度水平的预测因素(P <.0001)。

结论

在TBI住院康复环境中,使用治疗强度康复量表可以观察到患者的努力程度并进行可靠评分。遭受TBI的患者在康复治疗课程中的努力程度各不相同,随着住院时间的延长,努力程度往往会增加。PTA和激越行为是显著降低患者治疗努力程度的主要危险因素。

相似文献

3
Occupational, Physical, and Speech Therapy Treatment Activities During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S222-34.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.028.
6
Predictors of Agitated Behavior During Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S274-81.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.04.020.
7
Factors associated with balance deficits on admission to rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001 Jun;16(3):238-52. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200106000-00003.
8
Institutional Variation in Traumatic Brain Injury Acute Rehabilitation Practice.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.034.
9
Effects of Patient Preinjury and Injury Characteristics on Acute Rehabilitation Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S209-21.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.026.

本文引用的文献

1
Traumatic Brain Injury-Practice Based Evidence Study: Design and Patients, Centers, Treatments, and Outcomes.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S178-96.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.042.
3
Developing and evaluating prediction models in rehabilitation populations.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8 Suppl):S138-53. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.021.
4
Developing and using evidence to improve rehabilitation practice.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Aug;93(8 Suppl):S97-100. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 Jun 7.
5
Advances in analysis of longitudinal data.
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:79-107. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153550.
6
Development and validation of a prediction model with missing predictor data: a practical approach.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;63(2):205-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.03.017. Epub 2009 Jul 12.
7
Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.
Psychol Bull. 1979 Mar;86(2):420-8. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420.
8
The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale: development and psychometric properties.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Jul;88(7):877-84. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.030.
9
Comparison of the O-Log and GOAT as measures of posttraumatic amnesia.
Brain Inj. 2007 May;21(5):513-20. doi: 10.1080/02699050701311026.
10
Agitation in acquired brain injury: impact on acute rehabilitation therapies.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2007 May-Jun;22(3):177-83. doi: 10.1097/01.HTR.0000271118.96780.bc.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验