Seel Ronald T, Corrigan John D, Dijkers Marcel P, Barrett Ryan S, Bogner Jennifer, Smout Randall J, Garmoe William, Horn Susan D
Crawford Research Institute, Shepherd Center, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Aug;96(8 Suppl):S235-44. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.027.
To describe patients' level of effort in occupational, physical, and speech therapy sessions during traumatic brain injury (TBI) inpatient rehabilitation and to evaluate how age, injury severity, cognitive impairment, and time are associated with effort.
Prospective, multicenter, longitudinal cohort study.
Acute TBI rehabilitation programs.
Patients (N=1946) receiving 138,555 therapy sessions.
Not applicable.
Effort in rehabilitation sessions rated on the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale, FIM, Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score, posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), and Agitated Behavior Scale (ABS).
The Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale effort ratings in individual therapy sessions closely conformed to a normative distribution for all 3 disciplines. Mean Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale ratings for patients' therapy sessions were higher in the discharge week than in the admission week (P<.001). For patients who completed 2, 3, or 4 weeks of rehabilitation, differences in effort ratings (P<.001) were observed between 5 subgroups stratified by admission FIM cognitive scores and over time. In linear mixed-effects modeling, age and Comprehensive Severity Index brain injury severity score at admission, days from injury to rehabilitation admission, days from admission, and daily ratings of PTA and ABS score were predictors of level of effort (P<.0001).
Patients' level of effort can be observed and reliably rated in the TBI inpatient rehabilitation setting using the Rehabilitation Intensity of Therapy Scale. Patients who sustain TBI show varying levels of effort in rehabilitation therapy sessions, with effort tending to increase over the stay. PTA and agitated behavior are primary risk factors that substantially reduce patient effort in therapies.
描述创伤性脑损伤(TBI)住院康复期间患者在职业、物理和言语治疗课程中的努力程度,并评估年龄、损伤严重程度、认知障碍和时间与努力程度之间的关联。
前瞻性、多中心、纵向队列研究。
急性TBI康复项目。
接受138,555次治疗课程的患者(N = 1946)。
不适用。
根据治疗强度康复量表、FIM、综合严重程度指数脑损伤严重程度评分、创伤后遗忘(PTA)和激越行为量表(ABS)对康复课程中的努力程度进行评分。
在所有3个学科中,个体治疗课程的治疗强度康复量表努力程度评分都紧密符合正态分布。患者治疗课程的平均治疗强度康复量表评分在出院周高于入院周(P <.001)。对于完成2、3或4周康复的患者,在按入院FIM认知评分分层的5个亚组之间以及随着时间推移,努力程度评分存在差异(P <.001)。在线性混合效应模型中,入院时的年龄和综合严重程度指数脑损伤严重程度评分、从受伤到康复入院的天数、入院天数以及PTA和ABS评分的每日评分是努力程度水平的预测因素(P <.0001)。
在TBI住院康复环境中,使用治疗强度康复量表可以观察到患者的努力程度并进行可靠评分。遭受TBI的患者在康复治疗课程中的努力程度各不相同,随着住院时间的延长,努力程度往往会增加。PTA和激越行为是显著降低患者治疗努力程度的主要危险因素。