Frey Kimberly L, Rojas Donald C, Anderson C Alan, Arciniegas David B
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, HealthONE Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital, Aurora, Colorado 80011, USA.
Brain Inj. 2007 May;21(5):513-20. doi: 10.1080/02699050701311026.
To compare PTA severity and duration assessments made by Orientation Log (O-Log) and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and the relationship of data yielded by these assessments to rehabilitation outcomes.
Retrospective study.
O-Log, GOAT, demographic, length of stay, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) data among 83 inpatient subjects with recent TBI requiring inpatient care were reviewed.
PTA severity and duration as assessed by the O-Log and the GOAT are statistically similar and correlate similarly with rehabilitation LOS and discharge total FIM score. Simple linear regression models suggest that O-Log scores better predict rehabilitation outcomes than GOAT scores.
Although the O-Log and GOAT perform similarly as measures of PTA severity and duration, PTA assessments using the O-Log offers better prediction of rehabilitation outcomes. Further study of the O-Log as an alternate assessment of PTA is warranted.
比较使用定向日志(O-Log)和加尔维斯顿定向遗忘测试(GOAT)进行的创伤后遗忘症(PTA)严重程度和持续时间评估,以及这些评估所产生的数据与康复结果之间的关系。
回顾性研究。
回顾了83名近期因创伤性脑损伤(TBI)需要住院治疗的住院患者的O-Log、GOAT、人口统计学数据、住院时间以及功能独立性测量(FIM)数据。
通过O-Log和GOAT评估的PTA严重程度和持续时间在统计学上相似,并且与康复住院时间和出院时的FIM总分具有相似的相关性。简单线性回归模型表明,O-Log评分比GOAT评分能更好地预测康复结果。
尽管O-Log和GOAT在作为PTA严重程度和持续时间的测量方法上表现相似,但使用O-Log进行的PTA评估能更好地预测康复结果。有必要对O-Log作为PTA的替代评估方法进行进一步研究。