比较O-Log和GOAT作为创伤后遗忘症测量指标的情况。
Comparison of the O-Log and GOAT as measures of posttraumatic amnesia.
作者信息
Frey Kimberly L, Rojas Donald C, Anderson C Alan, Arciniegas David B
机构信息
Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit, HealthONE Spalding Rehabilitation Hospital, Aurora, Colorado 80011, USA.
出版信息
Brain Inj. 2007 May;21(5):513-20. doi: 10.1080/02699050701311026.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
To compare PTA severity and duration assessments made by Orientation Log (O-Log) and the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test (GOAT) and the relationship of data yielded by these assessments to rehabilitation outcomes.
RESEARCH DESIGN
Retrospective study.
METHODS AND PROCEDURES
O-Log, GOAT, demographic, length of stay, and Functional Independence Measure (FIM) data among 83 inpatient subjects with recent TBI requiring inpatient care were reviewed.
MAIN OUTCOMES AND RESULTS
PTA severity and duration as assessed by the O-Log and the GOAT are statistically similar and correlate similarly with rehabilitation LOS and discharge total FIM score. Simple linear regression models suggest that O-Log scores better predict rehabilitation outcomes than GOAT scores.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the O-Log and GOAT perform similarly as measures of PTA severity and duration, PTA assessments using the O-Log offers better prediction of rehabilitation outcomes. Further study of the O-Log as an alternate assessment of PTA is warranted.
主要目的
比较使用定向日志（O-Log）和加尔维斯顿定向遗忘测试（GOAT）进行的创伤后遗忘症（PTA）严重程度和持续时间评估，以及这些评估所产生的数据与康复结果之间的关系。
研究设计
回顾性研究。
方法与步骤
回顾了83名近期因创伤性脑损伤（TBI）需要住院治疗的住院患者的O-Log、GOAT、人口统计学数据、住院时间以及功能独立性测量（FIM）数据。
主要结果
通过O-Log和GOAT评估的PTA严重程度和持续时间在统计学上相似，并且与康复住院时间和出院时的FIM总分具有相似的相关性。简单线性回归模型表明，O-Log评分比GOAT评分能更好地预测康复结果。
结论
尽管O-Log和GOAT在作为PTA严重程度和持续时间的测量方法上表现相似，但使用O-Log进行的PTA评估能更好地预测康复结果。有必要对O-Log作为PTA的替代评估方法进行进一步研究。
Zotero 插件