• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

特定自我效能感在积极情绪对认知表现影响中的调节作用。

The moderating role of specific self-efficacy in the impact of positive mood on cognitive performance.

作者信息

Niemiec Tomasz, Lachowicz-Tabaczek Kinga

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, University of Wroclaw, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527 Wrocław, Poland.

出版信息

Motiv Emot. 2015;39(4):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9469-3.

DOI:10.1007/s11031-014-9469-3
PMID:26213428
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4508366/
Abstract

Research concerning the impact of positive mood on cognitive performance is inconsistent. We suggest that specific self-efficacy moderates this relationship. The current study proposed that participants in a positive mood with a high level of specific self-efficacy would anticipate mood-maintaining success on a task. Hence, they would be more strongly motivated, and perform better on the task, than individuals in other moods. Conversely, participants in a positive mood with low specific self-efficacy should expect mood-threatening failure. Thus, these individuals should be less motivated and perform more poorly than individuals in other moods. The current study included 139 participants with different levels of specific self-efficacy performing a comprehension task in either a positive or negative mood or a control condition. Results confirmed our hypothesis whereby specific self-efficacy affects cognitive performance but only during a positive mood. These findings support the role of specific self-efficacy in maintaining positive mood by regulating task activity.

摘要

关于积极情绪对认知表现影响的研究结果并不一致。我们认为特定自我效能会调节这种关系。当前研究提出,具有高特定自我效能的积极情绪参与者会预期在一项任务上保持情绪成功。因此,与处于其他情绪状态的个体相比,他们会更有动力,并且在任务上表现得更好。相反,具有低特定自我效能的积极情绪参与者应该预期会出现威胁情绪的失败。因此,与处于其他情绪状态的个体相比,这些个体的动力应该更小,表现也更差。当前研究包括139名具有不同特定自我效能水平的参与者,他们在积极或消极情绪或控制条件下执行一项理解任务。结果证实了我们的假设,即特定自我效能会影响认知表现,但仅在积极情绪期间。这些发现支持了特定自我效能通过调节任务活动来维持积极情绪的作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a64/4508366/fc132c97959e/11031_2014_9469_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a64/4508366/fc132c97959e/11031_2014_9469_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a64/4508366/fc132c97959e/11031_2014_9469_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The moderating role of specific self-efficacy in the impact of positive mood on cognitive performance.特定自我效能感在积极情绪对认知表现影响中的调节作用。
Motiv Emot. 2015;39(4):498-505. doi: 10.1007/s11031-014-9469-3.
2
[Effects of structure of self-knowledge on mood-incongruent effect].
Shinrigaku Kenkyu. 2006 Aug;77(3):217-26. doi: 10.4992/jjpsy.77.217.
3
I want to be creative: exploring the role of hedonic contingency theory in the positive mood-cognitive flexibility link.我想要富有创造力:探索享乐偶联理论在积极情绪与认知灵活性联系中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Feb;94(2):214-30. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.2.94.2.214.
4
Goals, mood and performance duration on cognitive tasks during experimentally induced mechanical pressure pain.在实验性机械压力疼痛下认知任务的目标、情绪和绩效持续时间。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2013 Jun;44(2):240-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2012.07.009. Epub 2012 Aug 10.
5
The impact of negative affect on autobiographical memory: the role of self-focused attention to moods.消极情绪对自传体记忆的影响:自我聚焦于情绪的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Dec;75(6):1424-40. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.6.1424.
6
How affective states, task difficulty, and self-concepts influence the formation and consequences of performance expectancies.情绪状态、任务难度和自我概念如何影响绩效期望的形成和后果。
Cogn Emot. 2011 Feb;25(2):220-8. doi: 10.1080/02699931003802640.
7
The impact of negative moods on self-enhancing cognitions: the role of reflective versus ruminative mood orientations.消极情绪对自我提升认知的影响:反思性与沉思性情绪取向的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Nov;93(5):728-50. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.728.
8
Enhancement motives moderate the relationship between high-arousal positive moods and drinking quantity: Evidence from a 22-day experience sampling study.增强动机调节高唤醒积极情绪与饮酒量之间的关系:来自一项为期22天的经验抽样研究的证据。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2015 Nov;34(6):595-602. doi: 10.1111/dar.12235. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
9
Effects of self-complexity on mood-incongruent recall.自我复杂性对情绪不一致性回忆的影响。
Jpn Psychol Res. 2004 May;46(2):127-134. doi: 10.1111/j.0021-5368.2004.00244.x.
10
Rapid improvement in beliefs, mood, and performance following an experimental success experience in an analogue test of recovery-oriented cognitive therapy.在以恢复为导向的认知治疗的模拟测试中获得实验成功经验后,信念、情绪和表现迅速改善。
Psychol Med. 2018 Jan;48(2):261-268. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700160X. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Yes, I Can: The Interplay of Need for Cognition and Task Confidence in Cognitive Task Performance.是的,我能:认知需求与认知任务表现中的任务信心之间的相互作用。
J Intell. 2024 Dec 15;12(12):128. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12120128.
2
Investigating Relationships Among Self-Efficacy, Mood, and Anxiety Using Digital Technologies: Randomized Controlled Trial.使用数字技术研究自我效能感、情绪和焦虑之间的关系:随机对照试验
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Aug 14;7:e45749. doi: 10.2196/45749.
3
A Positive Psychology Resource for Students? Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the 6 Minutes Diary in a Randomized Control Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing the validity of sales self-efficacy: a cautionary tale.评估销售自我效能的有效性:一个警示故事。
J Appl Psychol. 2013 Jul;98(4):690-700. doi: 10.1037/a0032232. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
2
When feeling bad makes you look good: guilt, shame, and person perception.当感到内疚和羞耻会让你看起来更好:内疚、羞耻和对人的感知。
Cogn Emot. 2012;26(3):407-30. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.675879.
3
Depending on My Mood: Mood-Driven Influences on Text Comprehension.取决于我的情绪:情绪对文本理解的驱动影响
一份面向学生的积极心理学资源?六分钟日记在随机对照试验中的有效性评估。
Front Psychol. 2022 May 31;13:896741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.896741. eCollection 2022.
4
Precision Teaching and Learning Performance in a Blended Learning Environment.混合学习环境中的精准教学与学习表现
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 5;12:631125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631125. eCollection 2021.
5
Well Done! Effects of Positive Feedback on Perceived Self-Efficacy, Flow and Performance in a Mental Arithmetic Task.干得好!积极反馈对心算任务中自我效能感、心流体验和表现的影响。
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 10;11:1008. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01008. eCollection 2020.
6
Influencing Change: When "Best Practice" Changes and the Prototypical Good Farmer Turns Bad.影响变革:当“最佳实践”发生变化,典型的好农民变成坏农民时。
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Mar 31;7:161. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00161. eCollection 2020.
7
Effects of Valence and Emotional Intensity on the Comprehension and Memorization of Texts.效价和情感强度对文本理解与记忆的影响
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 1;10:179. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00179. eCollection 2019.
J Educ Psychol. 2011 Aug;103(3):562-577. doi: 10.1037/a0023458.
4
Emotional intelligence in young and middle adulthood: cross-sectional analysis of latent structure and means.
Psychol Aging. 2006 Jun;21(2):411-8. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.411.
5
Don't worry, be happy? Neuroticism, trait-consistent affect regulation, and performance.别担心,要开心?神经质、特质一致的情绪调节与表现。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Sep;89(3):449-61. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.449.
6
The stability of vocational interests from early adolescence to middle adulthood: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies.从青春期早期到中年期职业兴趣的稳定性:纵向研究的定量综述
Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):713-737. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.5.713.
7
Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance.对特质类个体差异、状态类个体差异和学习表现之间关系的考察。
J Appl Psychol. 2000 Dec;85(6):835-47. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.835.
8
Mood and the use of scripts: does a happy mood really lead to mindlessness?情绪与脚本的运用:愉悦的情绪真的会导致思维不活跃吗?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Oct;71(4):665-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.4.665.
9
Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994 Jun;66(6):1034-48. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.66.6.1034.
10
Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: the hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing.积极情绪会增加或减少信息审查:情绪与信息加工的享乐偶联观点。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jul;69(1):5-15. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.69.1.5.