University of New Mexico.
Emotion. 2015 Dec;15(6):694-8. doi: 10.1037/emo0000102. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
Researchers frequently disagree about the latent structure of emotions. Taxometric analysis--a method for determining whether the latent structure of a construct is best defined as categorical or purely dimensional--can be a useful tool for resolving these debates. The present study used taxometric analysis to investigate the latent structure of envy. Scholars disagree about whether envy is necessarily malicious or whether it can also be benign. Van de Ven, Zeelenberg, and Pieters (2009) claim that benign envy exists, and that it is distinct from malicious envy. Much of their evidence for this claim relies on latent class analysis, which can be biased toward creating categories with data that actually vary dimensionally (Cleland, Rothschild, & Haslam, 2000; Uebersax, 1999). Therefore, taxometric analysis provides a more conservative test for an underlying categorical structure. A daily diary procedure was used to measure participants' day-to-day experiences of envy. The results support van de Ven et al.'s claim that benign envy exists, and that is distinct from malicious envy.
研究人员经常对情绪的潜在结构存在分歧。分类分析——一种用于确定构念的潜在结构最好被定义为类别还是纯粹维度的方法——可以成为解决这些争议的有用工具。本研究使用分类分析来研究嫉妒的潜在结构。学者们对嫉妒是否一定是恶意的,或者它是否也可以是良性的存在分歧。Van de Ven、Zeelenberg 和 Pieters(2009)声称存在良性嫉妒,并且它与恶意嫉妒不同。他们的这一说法的大部分证据依赖于潜在类别分析,这种分析可能会偏向于根据实际上是维度变化的数据创建类别(Cleland、Rothschild 和 Haslam,2000;Uebersax,1999)。因此,分类分析为潜在的类别结构提供了更保守的检验。使用日常日记程序来衡量参与者日常的嫉妒体验。结果支持 van de Ven 等人的说法,即存在良性嫉妒,并且与恶意嫉妒不同。