Pisanty Gideon, Mandelik Yael
Ecol Appl. 2015 Apr;25(3):742-52. doi: 10.1890/14-0910.1.
Wild pollinators, bees in particular, may greatly contribute to crop pollination and provide a safety net against declines in commercial pollinators. However, the identity, life history traits, and environmental sensitivities of main crop pollinator species.have received limited attention. These are crucial for predicting pollination services of different communities and for developing management practices that enhance crop pollinators. We sampled wild bees in three crop systems (almond, confection sunflower, and seed watermelon) in a mosaic Israeli Mediterranean landscape. Bees were sampled in field/orchard edges and interiors, and in seminatural scrub surrounding the fields/orchards. We also analyzed land cover at 50-2500 m radii around fields/orchards. We used this data to distinguish crop from non-crop pollinators based on a set of life history traits (nesting, lecty, sociality, body size) linked to habitat preference and crop visitation. Bee abundance and species richness decreased from the surrounding seminatural habitat to the field/orchard interior, especially across the seminatural habitat-field edge ecotone. Thus, although rich bee communities were found near fields, only small fractions crossed the ecotone and visited crop flowers in substantial numbers. The bee assemblage in agricultural fields/orchards and on crop flowers was dominated by ground-nesting bees of the tribe Halictini, which tend to nest within fields. Bees' habitat preferences were determined mainly by nesting guild, whereas crop visitation was determined mainly by sociality. Lecty and body size also affected both measures. The percentage of surrounding seminatural habitat at 250-2500 m radii had a positive effect on wild bee diversity in field edges, for all bee guilds, while at 50-100 m radii, only aboveground nesters were positively affected. In sum, we found that crop and non-crop pollinators are distinguished by behavioral and morphological traits. Hence, analysis of life-history traits of bee communities can help assess the pollination services they are likely to provide (when taking into account single-visit pollination efficiency). The ecotone between agricultural fields and surrounding habitats is a major barrier that filters many bee species, particularly with regard to their nesting requirements. Thus, greater attention should be given to management practices that encourage pollinators to live and nest, and not only forage, within fields.
野生传粉者,尤其是蜜蜂,可能对作物授粉有很大贡献,并在商业传粉者减少时提供一个安全保障。然而,主要作物传粉者物种的身份、生活史特征和环境敏感性受到的关注有限。这些对于预测不同群落的授粉服务以及制定增强作物传粉者的管理措施至关重要。我们在以色列地中海马赛克景观中的三种作物系统(杏仁、食用向日葵和籽用西瓜)中对野生蜜蜂进行了采样。在田间/果园边缘和内部以及田间/果园周围的半自然灌丛中对蜜蜂进行采样。我们还分析了田间/果园周围半径50 - 2500米范围内的土地覆盖情况。我们利用这些数据,根据与栖息地偏好和作物访花相关的一组生活史特征(筑巢、取食类型、社会性、体型)来区分作物传粉者和非作物传粉者。蜜蜂的丰度和物种丰富度从周围的半自然栖息地到田间/果园内部逐渐降低,尤其是在半自然栖息地 - 田间边缘交错带。因此,尽管在农田附近发现了丰富的蜜蜂群落,但只有一小部分穿过交错带并大量访问作物花朵。农田/果园和作物花朵上的蜜蜂群落主要由隧蜂族的地栖蜜蜂主导,它们倾向于在田间筑巢。蜜蜂的栖息地偏好主要由筑巢类群决定,而作物访花主要由社会性决定。取食类型和体型也对这两个指标有影响。对于所有蜜蜂类群,25