Lavingia Kedar S, Collins Jay N, Soult Michael C, Terzian W Helman, Weireter Leonard J, Britt L D
Department of Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA.
Am Surg. 2015 Aug;81(8):798-801.
Reliance on CT imaging in the evaluation of low-impact blunt trauma is a major source of radiation exposure, cost, and resource utilization. This study sought to determine if torso (chest and abdomen) CT could be avoided in patients with ground level falls. This was a retrospective chart review of patients admitted to the trauma service between January 2013 and April 2014. The mechanism of injury was ground level fall or fall from sitting. Patient demographics, physical examination (PE) findings, imaging results, length of stay, and complications were reviewed. History and physical data were based on chief resident or attending documentation. A significant thoracic injury was defined as a hemothorax, a pneumothorax, greater than three rib fractures, or aortic injury. A significant abdominal injury was defined as a solid organ injury, an intra-abdominal hematoma, a hollow viscus injury, aortic injury, or a urologic injury. The trauma service evaluated 156 patients. Nine patients were excluded for intubation or Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) < 13. Of the 147 remaining, mean age was 69 years, mean GCS was 14.8. A chest CT was obtained in 111 (76%). Eight (7%) had a significant thoracic injury. All patients with significant thoracic injury had positive examination findings. No patient with a normal PE was found to have a significant thoracic injury (negative predictive value of 100%). An abdominal CT was obtained in 86 (59%). Five (6%) were found to have a significant abdominal injury. All patients who had a significant radiographic injury had an abnormal PE (negative predictive value of 100%). In conclusion, thorough history and physical in the trauma bay allow the clinician to obtain selective torso CT imaging. Routine torso CT warrants re-evaluation in low-impact injury mechanisms as there appears to be little benefit compared with the resource utilization and expense.
在评估低能量钝性创伤时依赖CT成像,是辐射暴露、成本及资源利用的一个主要来源。本研究旨在确定在平地跌倒患者中是否可避免进行躯干(胸部和腹部)CT检查。这是一项对2013年1月至2014年4月间创伤科收治患者的回顾性病历审查。损伤机制为平地跌倒或从坐位跌落。对患者的人口统计学资料、体格检查(PE)结果、影像学检查结果、住院时间及并发症进行了审查。病史和体格检查数据基于总住院医师或主治医生的记录。严重胸部损伤定义为血胸、气胸、三根以上肋骨骨折或主动脉损伤。严重腹部损伤定义为实体器官损伤、腹腔内血肿、中空脏器损伤、主动脉损伤或泌尿系统损伤。创伤科共评估了156例患者。9例因插管或格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分<13而被排除。其余147例患者的平均年龄为69岁,平均GCS评分为14.8。111例(76%)患者进行了胸部CT检查。8例(7%)有严重胸部损伤。所有有严重胸部损伤的患者体格检查结果均为阳性。未发现体格检查正常的患者有严重胸部损伤(阴性预测值为100%)。86例(59%)患者进行了腹部CT检查。5例(6%)被发现有严重腹部损伤。所有有明显影像学损伤的患者体格检查均异常(阴性预测值为100%)。总之,在创伤室进行全面的病史询问和体格检查,可使临床医生获得选择性的躯干CT成像。对于低能量损伤机制,常规躯干CT检查值得重新评估,因为与资源利用和费用相比,其益处似乎不大。