Institute for the Health Sciences, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) at Gjøvik, NTNU Gjøvik, Postbox 191, 2802, Gjøvik, Norway.
Department of Community Health Sciences and The Health Technology Assessment Unit, O'Brien Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 4Z6, Canada.
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Apr 21;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00798-2.
Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children.
A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included.
A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations.
A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.
PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.
医疗资源的不当和浪费使用是一个普遍存在的问题,占西方世界卫生服务支出的 10-34%。尽管诊断成像对于确定正确的诊断和实施正确的治疗至关重要,但低价值的成像——即诊断测试几乎没有带来临床益处——是很常见的,并且导致了医疗资源的不当和浪费使用。人们对低价值成像的类型和程度知之甚少。因此,本研究的目的是确定、描述和量化成人和儿童低价值诊断成像检查的类型和程度。
对已发表文献进行了范围综述。在 Medline-Ovid、Embase-Ovid、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 中检索了 2010 年至 2020 年 9 月发表的研究。检索策略是基于诊断成像/放射学的医学主题词(Mesh)构建的,或健康服务滥用/医学过度使用或程序和技术利用/设施和服务利用。纳入的文章为英文、德文、荷兰文、瑞典文、丹麦文或挪威文。
共确定了 39986 条记录,其中 370 项研究纳入最终综合分析。共确定了 84 项低价值成像检查。未发现创伤性疼痛、轻微头部外伤的常规成像、创伤、血栓形成、尿石症、胸部介入后、骨折随访和癌症分期/随访的低价值成像检查。低价值成像的比例在 2%至 100%之间,存在不适当或不必要的检查。
本研究为成人和儿童确定了一系列综合的低价值放射学检查。未来的研究应重点关注低价值成像利用的原因和减少国际上低价值成像使用的干预措施。
PROSPERO: CRD42020208072。