Need to define patient engagement in research.
作者信息
Lough Shannon
机构信息
CMAJ.
出版信息
CMAJ. 2015 Sep 8;187(12):E385-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5109. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Need to define patient engagement in research.需要定义患者在研究中的参与度。
CMAJ. 2015 Sep 8;187(12):E385-6. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.109-5109. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
2
Patients' assessments of the outcomes of primary care consultations.患者对初级保健咨询结果的评估。
Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl. 1993;2:68-71. doi: 10.3109/02813439309045507.
3
Perspectives on clinical outcomes assessment: a view for the allied health professions.临床结局评估的观点：对联合健康专业的看法。
J Allied Health. 1999 Winter;28(4):240-6.
4
Health Outcomes Institute launches Outcomes Management System.健康结果研究所推出结果管理系统。
QRC Advis. 1996 Jan;12(3):1, 6-8.
5
Rehabilitation research: we should care and we should act.康复研究：我们应予以关注并付诸行动。
PM R. 2010 Jul;2(7):591-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2010.06.001.
6
Health services research: evolution and applications.卫生服务研究：演变与应用
Hand Clin. 2014 Aug;30(3):259-68, v. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2014.05.004.
7
Perspectives on the outcomes movement.对成果运动的看法。
Front Health Serv Manage. 1991 Winter;8(2):53-7.
8
Health-care outcomes research. Texas Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs.医疗保健结果研究。德克萨斯州医学协会科学事务委员会。
Tex Med. 1996 Jul;92(7):61-71.
9
Meaningful information or a bureaucratic exercise? Exploring the value of routine outcome measurement in mental health.有意义的信息还是官僚主义的做法？探索心理健康常规结果测量的价值。
Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2008 Oct;29(10):1098-114. doi: 10.1080/01612840802319852.
10
Does health systems thinking guide health services actions?卫生系统思维是否能指导卫生服务行动？
Health Serv Res. 2000 Mar;34(7):1409-12.
引用本文的文献
1
#HowNotToDoPatientEngagement: the engaging with purpose patient engagement framework based on a twitter analysis of community perspectives on patient engagement.# 患者参与的错误方式：基于对患者参与社区观点的推特分析得出的“有目的参与”患者参与框架
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Dec 13;9(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00527-1.
2
Exploring the lived experience of patients and families who speak language other than English (LOE) for healthcare: developing a qualitative study.探索非英语母语患者及其家属在医疗保健方面的生活经历：开展一项定性研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00465-y.
3
Promoting patient engagement in cancer genomics research programs: An environmental scan.促进患者参与癌症基因组学研究项目：一项环境扫描。
Front Genet. 2023 Jan 18;14:1053613. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1053613. eCollection 2023.
4
Rethinking Patient Engagement in Cancer Research.重新思考患者在癌症研究中的参与度。
Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00604-9. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
5
Applicability of a national strategy for patient-oriented research to people who use(d) substances: a Canadian experience.以患者为导向的研究国家战略对使用（过）药物的人群的适用性：加拿大的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 May 24;8(1):22. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00351-z.
6
Enhancing patient and public contribution in health outcome selection during clinical guideline development: an ethnographic study.在临床指南制定过程中增强患者和公众对健康结局选择的参与：一项民族志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 18;22(1):361. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07736-6.
7
Changing relationships: how does patient involvement transform professional identity? An ethnographic study.改变关系：患者参与如何改变专业身份？一项民族志研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 9;11(7):e045520. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045520.
8
Coached, Coordinated, Enhanced Neonatal Transition (CCENT): protocol for a multicentre pragmatic randomised controlled trial of transition-to-home support for parents of high-risk infants.教练式、协调式、增强型新生儿过渡期管理（CCENT）：高危婴儿父母过渡期家庭支持的多中心实用随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 7;11(7):e046706. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046706.
9
Patients' engagement in primary care research: a case study in a Canadian context.患者参与初级保健研究：加拿大背景下的一个案例研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Nov 1;6(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00238-x.
10
Engaging indigenous patient partners in patient-oriented research: lessons from a one-year initiative.让原住民患者伙伴参与以患者为导向的研究：一项为期一年倡议的经验教训。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 22;6:44. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00216-3. eCollection 2020.
Zotero 插件