Suppr超能文献

5毫米多叶准直器(MMLC)是否适用于基于容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)的肺部立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)?使用RTOG-0813治疗计划标准,对传统和高剂量无 flattening filter光子束,将5毫米MMLC与2.5毫米高分辨率多叶准直器(HDMLC)进行剂量学比较。

Is 5 mm MMLC suitable for VMAT-based lung SBRT? A dosimetric comparison with 2.5 mm HDMLC using RTOG-0813 treatment planning criteria for both conventional and high-dose flattening filter-free photon beams.

作者信息

Subramanian Shanmuga V, Subramani Vellaiyan, Thirumalai Swamy Shanmugam, Gandhi Arun, Chilukuri Srinivas, Kathirvel Murugesan

机构信息

Bharathiar University.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Jul 8;16(4):112–124. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5415.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the suitability of 5 mm millennium multileaf collimator (MMLC) for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT)-based lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Thirty lung SBRT patient treatment plans along with their planning target volumes (ranging from 2.01 cc to 150.11 cc) were transferred to an inhomogeneous lung phantom and retrospectively planned using VMAT technique, along with the high definition multileaf collimator (HDMLC) and MMLC systems. The plans were evaluated using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG-0813) treatment planning criteria for target coverage, normal tissue sparing, and treatment efficiency for both the MMLC and HDMLC systems using flat and flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beams. Irrespective of the target volumes, both the MLC systems were able to satisfy the RTOG-0813 treatment planning criteria without having any major deviation. Dose conformity was marginally better with HDMLC. The average conformity index (CI) value was found to be 1.069 ± 0.034 and 1.075 ± 0.0380 for HDMLC and MMLC plans, respectively. For the 6 MV FFF beams, the plan was slightly more conformal, with the average CI values of 1.063 ± 0.029 and 1.073 ± 0.033 for the HDMLC and MMLC plans, respectively. The high dose spillage was the maximum for 2 cc volume set (3% for HDMLC and 3.1% for MMLC). In the case of low dose spillage, both the MLCs were within the protocol of no deviation, except for the 2 cc volume set. The results from this study revealed that VMAT-based lung SBRT using 5 mm MMLC satisfies the RTOG-0813 treatment planning criteria for the studied target size and shapes.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估5毫米千禧年多叶准直器(MMLC)用于基于容积调强弧形放疗(VMAT)的肺部立体定向体部放疗(SBRT)的适用性。将30例肺部SBRT患者的治疗计划及其计划靶体积(范围为2.01立方厘米至150.11立方厘米)转移至非均匀肺部体模,并使用VMAT技术以及高清多叶准直器(HDMLC)和MMLC系统进行回顾性计划。使用放射治疗肿瘤学组(RTOG-0813)的治疗计划标准,针对MMLC和HDMLC系统,使用扁平和平坦滤过器-free(FFF)光子束,对计划的靶区覆盖、正常组织保护和治疗效率进行评估。无论靶体积如何,两种MLC系统均能满足RTOG-0813治疗计划标准,且无任何重大偏差。HDMLC的剂量适形性略好。HDMLC和MMLC计划的平均适形指数(CI)值分别为1.069±0.034和1.075±0.0380。对于6 MV FFF束,计划的适形性略好,HDMLC和MMLC计划的平均CI值分别为1.063±0.029和1.073±0.033。高剂量溢出在2立方厘米体积组中最大(HDMLC为3%,MMLC为3.1%)。在低剂量溢出情况下,除2立方厘米体积组外,两种MLC均在无偏差协议范围内。本研究结果表明,使用5毫米MMLC的基于VMAT的肺部SBRT满足RTOG-0813对所研究靶区大小和形状的治疗计划标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9fa4/5690010/f1a450a9bb3d/ACM2-16-112-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验