Suppr超能文献

在胸椎转移瘤立体定向消融放疗中,Acuros XB与卷积/叠加技术及各向异性解析算法的剂量学比较

Dosimetric comparison of Acuros XB with collapsed cone convolution/superposition and anisotropic analytic algorithm for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of thoracic spinal metastases.

作者信息

Zhen Heming, Hrycushko Brian, Lee Huichen, Timmerman Robert, Pompoš Arnold, Stojadinovic Strahinja, Foster Ryan, Jiang Steve B, Solberg Timothy, Gu Xuejun

机构信息

UT Southwestern Medical Center.

出版信息

J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Jul 8;16(4):181–192. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5493.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the recent Eclipse Acuros XB (AXB) dose calculation engine with the Pinnacle collapsed cone convolution/superposition (CCC) dose calculation algorithm and the Eclipse anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) for stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) treatment planning of thoracic spinal (T-spine) metastases using IMRT and VMAT delivery techniques. The three commissioned dose engines (CCC, AAA, and AXB) were validated with ion chamber and EBT2 film measurements utilizing a heterogeneous slab-geometry water phantom and an anthropomorphic phantom. Step-and-shoot IMRT and VMAT treatment plans were developed and optimized for eight patients in Pinnacle, following our institutional SAbR protocol for spinal metastases. The CCC algorithm, with heterogeneity corrections, was used for dose calculations. These plans were then exported to Eclipse and recalculated using the AAA and AXB dose calculation algorithms. Various dosimetric parameters calculated with CCC and AAA were compared to that of the AXB calculations. In regions receiving above 50% of prescription dose, the calculated CCC mean dose is 3.1%-4.1% higher than that of AXB calculations for IMRT plans and 2.8%-3.5% higher for VMAT plans, while the calculated AAA mean dose is 1.5%-2.4% lower for IMRT and 1.2%-1.6% lower for VMAT. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed for most GTV and PTV indices between the CCC and AXB calculations for IMRT and VMAT, while differences between the AAA and AXB calculations were not statistically significant. For T-spine SAbR treatment planning, the CCC calculations give a statistically significant overestimation of target dose compared to AXB. AAA underestimates target dose with no statistical significance compared to AXB. Further study is needed to determine the clinical impact of these findings.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较最新的Eclipse Acuros XB(AXB)剂量计算引擎与Pinnacle的坍缩圆锥卷积/叠加(CCC)剂量计算算法以及Eclipse各向异性解析算法(AAA),用于采用调强放射治疗(IMRT)和容积调强弧形治疗(VMAT)技术的胸椎(T脊柱)转移瘤立体定向消融放疗(SAbR)治疗计划。使用非均匀平板几何水模体和人体模型,通过电离室和EBT2胶片测量对三种委托剂量引擎(CCC、AAA和AXB)进行了验证。按照我们机构针对脊柱转移瘤的SAbR方案,在Pinnacle中为8例患者制定并优化了静态调强放疗和VMAT治疗计划。采用具有不均匀性校正的CCC算法进行剂量计算。然后将这些计划导出到Eclipse,并使用AAA和AXB剂量计算算法重新计算。将CCC和AAA计算得到的各种剂量学参数与AXB计算结果进行比较。在接受超过50%处方剂量的区域,对于IMRT计划,计算得到的CCC平均剂量比AXB计算结果高3.1%-4.1%,对于VMAT计划高2.8%-3.5%,而对于IMRT,计算得到的AAA平均剂量低1.5%-2.4%,对于VMAT低1.2%-1.6%。对于IMRT和VMAT,CCC与AXB计算之间的大多数大体肿瘤体积(GTV)和计划靶体积(PTV)指标存在统计学显著差异(p<0.05),而AAA与AXB计算之间的差异无统计学意义。对于T脊柱SAbR治疗计划,与AXB相比,CCC计算在统计学上显著高估了靶区剂量。与AXB相比,AAA低估了靶区剂量,但无统计学意义。需要进一步研究以确定这些结果的临床影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验