Wang Yu, Guo Tao, Liang Guizheng, Zhao Ling, Pan Jiahua, Li Shumin, Hua Baotong, Pu Lijin
Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University Yunnan 650032, China.
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 May 15;8(5):8015-9. eCollection 2015.
The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcome of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) for transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) compared with the trans-esophageal echocardiography (TEE) guided method.
From May 2010 to April 2011, 46 patients who underwent ICE guided (n=23) or TEE guided (n=23) transcatheter closure of ASD were analyzed retrospectively. We compared the demographic characteristic, procedure parameters and outcomes between ICE- and TEE-guided groups.
No significant difference was found between 2 groups on demographic characteristics. Fluoroscopy time and procedure time was significantly decreased in ICE guided group than that in TEE-guided group. In addition, no significant difference was found on treatment outcomes, complications between these 2 groups.
ICE-guided ASD occlusion is safe and effective method, which provides more accurate anatomical information, shorter fluoroscopy time and procedure time.
本研究旨在探讨与经食管超声心动图(TEE)引导方法相比,心腔内超声心动图(ICE)引导经导管封堵房间隔缺损(ASD)的临床结果。
回顾性分析2010年5月至2011年4月期间46例行ICE引导(n = 23)或TEE引导(n = 23)经导管封堵ASD的患者。我们比较了ICE引导组和TEE引导组的人口统计学特征、手术参数和结果。
两组在人口统计学特征方面无显著差异。ICE引导组的透视时间和手术时间明显短于TEE引导组。此外,两组在治疗结果、并发症方面无显著差异。
ICE引导的ASD封堵术是一种安全有效的方法,可提供更准确的解剖信息,缩短透视时间和手术时间。