Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kajii-cho 465, Kawaramachi-Hirokoji, Kamigyo-ku, Kyoto, 602-8566, Japan.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 May;36(5):855-863. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01778-9. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) under general anesthesia (GA) or intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) under sedation is usually used for echocardiographic guidance during transcatheter atrial septal defect (ASD) closure. However, appropriate selection of guidance has not been fully established. Our study aimed to evaluate whether selection of guidance depending on anatomic ASD features and TEE tolerability under sedation contributes to procedure success. On the basis of anatomic ASD characteristics and TEE tolerability under sedation during the pre-procedural TEE, we selected either TEE, ICE, or combined TEE and ICE under moderate-to-deep sedation or TEE under GA for guidance. Anatomic characteristics of the defect, medical costs, complications, and primary outcomes for these four different types of guidance were analyzed. A total of 154 patients were classified into four guidance groups depending on the results of diagnostic TEE under sedation; 11 patients were scheduled for the procedure under GA in advance. Procedures were successfully completed in all but two patients in whom closure guided by TEE under sedation was attempted for an extremely large defect or extensive superior rim deficiency. Two patients who underwent TEE or combined TEE and ICE guidance under sedation were converted to ICE-only guidance due to desaturation or excessive body movement. Device dislodgement was not observed during the procedure or during median follow-up of 1188 days [interquartile range 577-1831]. Appropriate selection of guidance might contribute to successful transcatheter ASD closure.
经食管超声心动图(TEE)在全身麻醉(GA)下或镇静下的腔内超声心动图(ICE)通常用于经导管房间隔缺损(ASD)封堵术时的超声心动图引导。然而,指导方法的选择尚未完全确定。我们的研究旨在评估根据解剖 ASD 特征和镇静下 TEE 的耐受性选择指导方法是否有助于手术成功。根据术前 TEE 时的解剖 ASD 特征和镇静下 TEE 的耐受性,我们选择在中度至深度镇静下使用 TEE、ICE 或 TEE 和 ICE 联合,或在 GA 下使用 TEE 进行引导。分析了这四种不同引导方式的 ASD 解剖特征、医疗费用、并发症和主要结果。根据镇静下诊断性 TEE 的结果,将 154 例患者分为四组引导组;其中 11 例患者提前安排 GA 手术。除了两名患者因极度大的缺陷或广泛的上缘缺陷而尝试镇静下 TEE 引导的封堵外,所有患者的手术均成功完成。两名在镇静下接受 TEE 或 TEE 和 ICE 联合引导的患者因饱和度下降或过度身体运动而转换为仅 ICE 引导。在手术过程中或中位数 1188 天[四分位距 577-1831]的随访中均未观察到器械移位。适当的引导方法选择可能有助于经导管 ASD 封堵的成功。