Suppr超能文献

冷冻胚胎移植周期中使用雪诺酮凝胶进行黄体期支持:一项针对中国人群的前瞻性随机临床试验

Crinone Gel for Luteal Phase Support in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial in the Chinese Population.

作者信息

Wang Yang, He Yaqiong, Zhao Xiaoming, Ji Xiaowei, Hong Yan, Wang Yuan, Zhu Qinling, Xu Bin, Sun Yun

机构信息

Center for Reproductive Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China; Shanghai Key Laboratory for Assisted Reproduction and Reproductive Genetics, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0133027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133027. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

To compare Crinone vaginal progesterone gel with intramuscularly injected progesterone for luteal phase support in progesterone-supplemented frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles, a randomized prospective study of patients qualified for FET was conducted between September 2010 and January 2013 at a hospital in Shanghai, China. From the day of transformation into secretory phase endometrium (day 0), Crinone vaginal gel (90 mg/d) was administered to patients in the Gel Group, while progesterone (40 mg/d) was injected intramuscularly in patients in the Inj Group (n = 750 per group). All patients received oral dydrogesterone (20 mg/d) and estradiol valerate (4–8 mg/d). Day 3 embryos with the highest pre-frozen scores were transferred to patients in the two groups and the clinical outcomes compared. This study comprised 1,500 cycles (750 in each group). Twenty-nine cycles in the Gel Group and 24 in the Inj Group were withdrawn. There were no significant differences between groups in age, endometrial thickness, endometrial preparation time or number of embryos transferred. No significant differences were observed between the Gel Group and Inj Group in the rates of live birth (32.6% vs. 31.7%, P = 0.71), clinical pregnancy (40.1% vs. 40.6%, P = 0.831), implantation (25.8% vs. 25.3%, P = 0.772), abortion (16.3% vs. 18.3%, P = 0.514) or ectopic pregnancy (2.8% vs. 4.4%, P = 0.288). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the rates of live birth, clinical pregnancy, abortion and ectopic pregnancy (Gel Group relative to Inj Group) were 1.036 (0.829–1.295), 0.971 (0.785–1.200), 0.919 (0.595–1.420) and 0.649 (0.261–1.614), respectively. Our study revealed that using Crinone vaginal gel in FET cycles achieved similar pregnancy outcomes to intramuscular progesterone, indicating that vaginal gel is a viable alternative to intramuscular injection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR-TRC-14004565.

摘要

未标注

为比较在补充孕激素的冻融胚胎移植(FET)周期中,使用琪宁阴道用黄体酮凝胶与肌肉注射黄体酮进行黄体期支持的效果,于2010年9月至2013年1月在中国上海的一家医院对符合FET条件的患者进行了一项随机前瞻性研究。从子宫内膜转化为分泌期的当天(第0天)起,凝胶组患者给予琪宁阴道凝胶(90毫克/天),注射组患者(每组n = 750)肌肉注射黄体酮(40毫克/天)。所有患者均口服地屈孕酮(20毫克/天)和戊酸雌二醇(4 - 8毫克/天)。将预冻评分最高的第3天胚胎移植到两组患者体内,并比较临床结局。本研究共纳入1500个周期(每组750个)。凝胶组有29个周期、注射组有24个周期被剔除。两组患者在年龄、子宫内膜厚度、子宫内膜准备时间或移植胚胎数量方面无显著差异。凝胶组和注射组在活产率(32.6%对31.7%,P = 0.71)、临床妊娠率(40.1%对40.6%,P = 0.831)、着床率(25.8%对25.3%,P = 0.772)、流产率(16.3%对18.3%,P = 0.514)或异位妊娠率(2.8%对4.4%,P = 0.288)方面均未观察到显著差异。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,活产率、临床妊娠率、流产率和异位妊娠率(凝胶组相对于注射组)的优势比(95%置信区间)分别为1.036(0.829 - 1.295)、0.971(0.785 - 1.200)、0.919(0.595 - 1.420)和0.649(0.261 - 1.614)。我们的研究表明,在FET周期中使用琪宁阴道凝胶与肌肉注射黄体酮取得的妊娠结局相似,这表明阴道凝胶是肌肉注射的一种可行替代方法。

试验注册

中国临床试验注册中心ChiCTR - TRC - 14004565。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e45b/4519178/57e287cb36fa/pone.0133027.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验