Wolterbeek Bert, Sarmento Susana, Verburg Tona
Delft University of Technology, Reactor Institute Delft, RIH Radiation and Isotopes for Health, Mekelweg 15, 2629 JB Delft, The Netherlands.
ITN Institute, Estrada Nacional 10, Sacavem, Portugal.
J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2010;286(1):195-210. doi: 10.1007/s10967-010-0637-y. Epub 2010 Jun 5.
The present paper focuses on biomonitoring of elemental atmospheric pollution, which is reviewed in terms of larger-scaled biomonitoring surveys in an epidemiological context. Based on the literature information, today's availability of solar-powered small air filter samplers and fibrous ion exchange materials is regarded as adequate or an even better alternative for biomonitor transplant materials used in small-scaled set-ups, but biomonitors remain valuable in larger-scaled set-ups and in unforeseen releases and accidental situations. In the latter case, in-situ biomonitoring is seen as the only option for a retrospective study: biomoniors are there before one even knows that they are needed. For biomonitoring, nuclear analytical techniques are discussed as key techniques, especially because of the necessary multi-element assessments in both source recognition and single-element interpretation. To live up to the demands in an epidemiological context, larger-scaled in-situ biomonitoring asks for large numbers of samples, and consequently, for large total sample masses, this all to ensure representation of both local situations and survey area characteristics. Possibly, this point should direct studies into new "easy-to-sample" biomonitor organisms, of which high masses and numbers may be obtained in field work, rather than continue with biomonitors such as lichens. This also means that both sample handling and processing are of key importance in these studies. To avoid problems in comparability of analytical general procedures in milling, homogenization and digestion of samples of large masses, the paper proposes to involve only few but high-quality laboratories in the total element assessment routines. In this respect, facilities that can handle large sample masses in the assessment of element concentrations are to be preferred. This all highlights the involvement of large-sample-volume nuclear facilities, which, however, should be upgraded and automated in their operation to ensure the necessary sample throughput in larger-scaled biomonitoring.
本文聚焦于大气元素污染的生物监测,从流行病学背景下的大规模生物监测调查角度进行了综述。基于文献信息,如今太阳能小型空气过滤器采样器和纤维离子交换材料的可用性被认为足以替代或甚至优于小规模设置中使用的生物监测移植材料,但生物监测器在大规模设置以及意外释放和突发情况中仍具有重要价值。在后一种情况下,现场生物监测被视为回顾性研究的唯一选择:在人们甚至还不知道需要生物监测器之前,它们就已存在。对于生物监测,核分析技术作为关键技术进行了讨论,特别是因为在源识别和单元素解释中都需要进行多元素评估。为了满足流行病学背景下的要求,大规模现场生物监测需要大量样本,因此需要大量的总样本质量,这一切都是为了确保能够代表当地情况和调查区域特征。可能的是,这一点应引导研究转向新的“易于采样”的生物监测生物,在野外工作中可以获得大量的此类生物,而不是继续使用地衣等生物监测器。这也意味着样本处理和加工在这些研究中至关重要。为了避免在大规模样本的研磨、均质化和消化等分析常规程序的可比性方面出现问题,本文建议在总元素评估程序中仅涉及少数但高质量的实验室。在这方面,应优先选择能够处理大量样本以评估元素浓度的设施。这一切都凸显了大样本量核设施的参与,然而,这些设施的操作应进行升级和自动化,以确保在大规模生物监测中具备必要的样本通量。