Suppr超能文献

溶栓治疗对自发性冠状动脉夹层所致ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)有害还是有益?

Does thrombolytic therapy harm or help in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) caused by the spontaneous coronary dissection?

作者信息

Jović Zoran, Obradović Slobodan, Djenić Nemanja, Mladenović Zorica, Djurić Predrag, Spasić Marijan, Tavicovski Dragan

出版信息

Vojnosanit Pregl. 2015 Jun;72(6):536-40. doi: 10.2298/vsp1506536j.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a very rare disease with poor prognosis. It mainly affects young women free of risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD) and women during the peripartum period. The prognosis for myocardial infarction caused by SCAD is poor, management is often difficult and guidelines still missing.

CASE REPORT

We presented a woman with acute myocardial infarction of anterior wall of the left ventricle, caused by spontaneous dissection of medial segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery. We treated the patient with thrombolytic therapy and performed coronary angiography after that. Finally we decided to do nothing more. Two years later we performed coronary angiography again and founded the coronary artery normal. We also analyzed 19 cases publiched from 1996 to 2012 when coronary artery dissection had been treated with thrombolytic agent Analysis revealed only one case of 19, with complication after treating SCAD with thrombolysis.

CONCLUSION

Sometimes, regarding myocardial infarction in young women with no risk factors for CAD, especially in young women in peripartum, we should think about SCAD. The presented case, like eight others, demonstrates that good clinical outcomes can be achieved with thrombolysis. In spite of all this, we still need more data to verify that thrombolysis does not have to harm the therapy for SCAD. For the time being thrombolytic therapy could be an option.

摘要

引言

自发性冠状动脉夹层(SCAD)是一种非常罕见的疾病,预后较差。它主要影响无冠状动脉疾病(CAD)危险因素的年轻女性以及围产期女性。由SCAD导致的心肌梗死预后不佳,治疗往往困难,且尚无相关指南。

病例报告

我们报告了一名因左前降支冠状动脉中段自发性夹层导致左心室前壁急性心肌梗死的女性患者。我们对该患者进行了溶栓治疗,之后进行了冠状动脉造影。最后我们决定不再采取进一步措施。两年后我们再次进行冠状动脉造影,发现冠状动脉正常。我们还分析了1996年至2012年期间19例使用溶栓剂治疗冠状动脉夹层的病例。分析显示,19例中只有1例在溶栓治疗SCAD后出现并发症。

结论

有时,对于无CAD危险因素的年轻女性发生的心肌梗死,尤其是围产期年轻女性,我们应考虑到SCAD。本病例与其他8例病例一样,表明溶栓治疗可取得良好的临床效果。尽管如此,我们仍需要更多数据来证实溶栓治疗对SCAD无害。目前,溶栓治疗可能是一种选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验