Koren-Hakim Tamar, Weiss Avraham, Hershkovitz Avital, Otzrateni Irena, Anbar Ronit, Gross Nevo Revital Feige, Schlesinger Agata, Frishman Sigal, Salai Moshe, Beloosesky Yichayaou
Nutrition Unit, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Department of Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel.
Department of Geriatrics, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tikva, Israel; Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Clin Nutr. 2016 Oct;35(5):1053-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2015.07.014. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Malnutrition is common in hip fracture elderly patients. There is no gold standard for screening nutritional risk. We compared the adequacy of 3 screening tools, their association to nutritional measurements and their ability to predict outcome.
The Mini Nutrition Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF), the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) and the Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) were prospectively determined. Length of stay (LOS), complications, 6 months readmission and up-to 36 months mortality were recorded.
215 operated patients were included: 154 (71.6%) were women; mean age was 83.5 ± 6.09 years (66-104). According to the MNA-SF, 95 patients were well-nourished, 95 were at risk of malnutrition and 25 were malnourished. Based on the MUST, 171 patients were at a low risk of malnutrition, 31 at a medium risk, 13 at a high risk. According to the NRS-2002, 134 patients were at a low risk of malnutrition, 70 at a medium risk, 11 at a high risk. A significant relationship between the nutritional groups of the 3 scores (p < 0.001) was found. In all screening tools, body mass index, weight loss and food intake prior to admission were found to be related to the patients' nutritional status (p < 0.001). No differences in LOS and complications were found between the patients' nutritional status of each screening tool; only the MNA-SF predicted that well-nourished patients would have less readmissions during a 6 month follow-up (p = 0.024). During a 36 month follow-up, 79 patients died. According to the MNA-SF, mortality was lower in the well-nourished patients vs. the malnourished (p = 0.001) and at risk of malnutrition patients (p = 0.01). A less significant association was found between the NRS-2002 patients' nutritional status and mortality (p = 0.048). The MUST did not reveal this relationship.
All screening tools were adequate in assessing malnutrition parameters in hip fracture operated elderly patients, however, only the MNA-SF could also predict readmissions and mortality.
营养不良在髋部骨折老年患者中很常见。目前尚无筛查营养风险的金标准。我们比较了三种筛查工具的适用性、它们与营养测量指标的关联以及预测结局的能力。
前瞻性地确定了简易营养评估简表(MNA-SF)、营养不良通用筛查工具(MUST)和营养风险筛查2002(NRS-2002)。记录住院时间(LOS)、并发症、6个月再入院情况以及长达36个月的死亡率。
纳入215例接受手术的患者:154例(71.6%)为女性;平均年龄为83.5±6.09岁(66 - 104岁)。根据MNA-SF,95例患者营养状况良好,95例有营养不良风险,25例营养不良。基于MUST,171例患者营养不良风险低,31例中度风险,13例高度风险。根据NRS-2002,134例患者营养不良风险低,70例中度风险,11例高度风险。发现三种评分的营养组之间存在显著关系(p < 0.001)。在所有筛查工具中,体重指数、入院前体重减轻和食物摄入量均与患者营养状况相关(p < 0.001)。各筛查工具的患者营养状况在LOS和并发症方面未发现差异;只有MNA-SF预测营养状况良好的患者在6个月随访期间再入院次数较少(p = 0.024)。在36个月随访期间,79例患者死亡。根据MNA-SF,营养状况良好的患者死亡率低于营养不良患者(p = 0.001)和有营养不良风险的患者(p = 0.01)。NRS-2002患者营养状况与死亡率之间的关联不太显著(p = 0.048)。MUST未显示这种关系。
所有筛查工具在评估髋部骨折手术老年患者的营养不良参数方面都是适用的,然而,只有MNA-SF还能预测再入院情况和死亡率。