Hamilton Ian S, Schneider Justine, Kane Eddie, Jordan Melanie
Doctoral researcher at the University of Nottingham, School of Sociology and Social Policy, Law and Social Sciences Building, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.
Associate Fellow, Institute of Mental Health, Jubilee Campus, University of Nottingham Innovation Park, Triumph Road, Nottingham, NG7 2TU, UK.
BMC Psychiatry. 2015 Aug 1;15:185. doi: 10.1186/s12888-015-0553-3.
Offenders with a mental illness are routinely excluded from vocational services due to their mental health. Employment has shown to be very important in improving mental health, reducing recidivism, and connecting people to society. This study examines the effectiveness of an established intervention which is relatively untested in this population, Individual Placement and Support (IPS), to help offenders with mental health problems into competitive employment. The overall research question is whether IPS is effective in gaining and sustaining competitive employment for offenders with a Severe Mental Illness (SMI). The context is an English criminal justice setting across different populations. The study will also measure non-vocational outcomes such as recidivism, mental health and social stability.
METHODS/DESIGN: A Realistic Evaluation (RE) design will address the questions "What works, for whom, and in what circumstances?" This study includes pre and post comparisons for a cohort of approximately 20 people taking part in IPS, and a similar number of controls, over a one year period. The RE also consists of interviews with practitioners and offenders in order to understand how IPS works and develops within the criminal justice system (CJS). By applying this framework the research can go from discovering whether IPS works, to how and why (or why not) IPS works. This is achieved by examining where the intervention is occurring (Context (C)), the mechanisms (M) that create particular behaviours, and how the outcomes (O) from the intervention all come together (CMOs). Employment outcomes will also be examined for all participants.
By applying RE the research will permit inferences to be drawn about how and why (or why not) IPS works, by examining context, mechanisms and outcomes. IPS has never been implemented within the CJS in the United Kingdom. As a result, this evaluative research will not only provide a novel insight into the core research areas, but also how the intervention can be improved for others in the future.
患有精神疾病的罪犯通常因其心理健康状况而被排除在职业服务之外。就业已被证明在改善心理健康、减少累犯以及使人们融入社会方面非常重要。本研究考察一种既定干预措施——个别安置与支持(IPS),该措施在这一人群中相对未经检验,旨在帮助有心理健康问题的罪犯获得竞争性就业。总体研究问题是IPS对于患有严重精神疾病(SMI)的罪犯获得并维持竞争性就业是否有效。研究背景是英国不同人群的刑事司法环境。该研究还将衡量诸如累犯、心理健康和社会稳定性等非职业性结果。
方法/设计:一项现实评估(RE)设计将解决“什么有效,对谁有效,在什么情况下有效?”这些问题。本研究包括对一组约20名参与IPS的人员以及数量相近的对照组在一年时间内进行前后比较。现实评估还包括对从业者和罪犯进行访谈,以了解IPS在刑事司法系统(CJS)中如何运作和发展。通过应用这一框架,研究可以从发现IPS是否有效,深入到IPS如何以及为何(或为何不)有效。这是通过考察干预发生的地点(背景(C))、产生特定行为的机制(M)以及干预的结果(O)如何相互关联(CMO)来实现的。还将对所有参与者的就业结果进行考察。
通过应用现实评估,该研究将能够通过考察背景、机制和结果,推断出IPS如何以及为何(或为何不)有效。IPS从未在英国的刑事司法系统中实施过。因此,这项评估研究不仅将为核心研究领域提供全新的见解,还将为未来如何改进对其他人的干预提供参考。