Vázquez María-Luisa, Vargas Ingrid, Unger Jean-Pierre, De Paepe Pierre, Mogollón-Pérez Amparo Susana, Samico Isabella, Albuquerque Paulette, Eguiguren Pamela, Cisneros Angelica Ivonne, Rovere Mario, Bertolotto Fernando
Health Policy and Health Services Research Group, Health Policy Research Unit, Consortium for Health Care and Social Services of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain.
Public Sector Care Unit, Department of Public Health, Prince Leopold Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerpen, Belgium.
BMJ Open. 2015 Jul 31;5(7):e007037. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007037.
Although fragmentation in the provision of healthcare is considered an important obstacle to effective care, there is scant evidence on best practices in care coordination in Latin America. The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of a participatory shared care strategy in improving coordination across care levels and related care quality, in health services networks in six different healthcare systems of Latin America.
A controlled before and after quasi-experimental study taking a participatory action research approach. In each country, two comparable healthcare networks were selected--intervention and control. The study contains four phases: (1) A baseline study to establish network performance in care coordination and continuity across care levels, using (A) qualitative methods: semi-structured interviews and focus groups with a criterion sample of health managers, professionals and users; and (B) quantitative methods: two questionnaire surveys with samples of 174 primary and secondary care physicians and 392 users with chronic conditions per network. Sample size was calculated to detect a proportion difference of 15% and 10%, before and after intervention (α=0.05; β=0.2 in a two-sided test); (2) a bottom-up participatory design and implementation of shared care strategies involving micro-level care coordination interventions to improve the adequacy of patient referral and information transfer. Strategies are selected through a participatory process by the local steering committee (local policymakers, health care network professionals, managers, users and researchers), supported by appropriate training; (3) Evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions by measuring changes in levels of care coordination and continuity 18 months after implementation, applying the same design as in the baseline study; (4) Cross-country comparative analysis.
This study complies with international and national legal stipulations on ethics. Conditions of the study procedure were approved by each country's ethical committee. A variety of dissemination activities are implemented addressing the main stakeholders. Registration No.257 Clinical Research Register of the Santa Fe Health Department, Argentina.
尽管医疗服务提供的碎片化被视为有效护理的一个重要障碍,但在拉丁美洲,关于护理协调最佳实践的证据却很少。目的是评估参与式共享护理策略在改善拉丁美洲六个不同医疗系统的卫生服务网络中各护理层面之间的协调及相关护理质量方面的有效性。
采用参与式行动研究方法进行前后对照的准实验研究。在每个国家,选择两个可比的医疗网络——干预组和对照组。该研究包括四个阶段:(1)基线研究,通过以下方式确定各护理层面护理协调和连续性方面的网络绩效:(A)定性方法:对卫生管理人员、专业人员和用户的标准样本进行半结构化访谈和焦点小组讨论;(B)定量方法:对每个网络的174名初级和二级护理医生以及392名慢性病用户样本进行两次问卷调查。计算样本量以检测干预前后15%和10%的比例差异(双侧检验中α=0.05;β=0.2);(2)自下而上的参与式共享护理策略设计与实施,包括微观层面的护理协调干预措施,以提高患者转诊和信息传递的充分性。策略由当地指导委员会(当地政策制定者、医疗网络专业人员、管理人员、用户和研究人员)通过参与式过程选定,并得到适当培训的支持;(3)在实施18个月后,通过测量护理协调和连续性水平的变化来评估干预措施的有效性,采用与基线研究相同的设计;(4)跨国比较分析。
本研究符合国际和国家关于伦理的法律规定。研究程序条件已获每个国家伦理委员会批准。针对主要利益相关者开展了各种传播活动。注册号:阿根廷圣菲卫生部临床研究登记册第257号。