Cheetham Marcus, Wu Lingdan, Pauli Paul, Jancke Lutz
Department of Neuropsychology, University of Zurich Zurich, Switzerland ; Department of Psychology, Nungin University Seoul, South Korea.
Swiss Centre for Affective Sciences, University of Geneva Geneva, Switzerland ; Department of Psychology, University of Wurzburg Wurzburg, Germany.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 15;6:981. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00981. eCollection 2015.
The main prediction of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis (UVH) is that observation of humanlike characters that are difficult to distinguish from the human counterpart will evoke a state of negative affect. Well-established electrophysiological [late positive potential (LPP) and facial electromyography (EMG)] and self-report [Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM)] indices of valence and arousal, i.e., the primary orthogonal dimensions of affective experience, were used to test this prediction by examining affective experience in response to categorically ambiguous compared with unambiguous avatar and human faces (N = 30). LPP and EMG provided direct psychophysiological indices of affective state during passive observation and the SAM provided self-reported indices of affective state during explicit cognitive evaluation of static facial stimuli. The faces were drawn from well-controlled morph continua representing the UVH' dimension of human likeness (DHL). The results provide no support for the notion that category ambiguity along the DHL is specifically associated with enhanced experience of negative affect. On the contrary, the LPP and SAM-based measures of arousal and valence indicated a general increase in negative affective state (i.e., enhanced arousal and negative valence) with greater morph distance from the human end of the DHL. A second sample (N = 30) produced the same finding, using an ad hoc self-rating scale of feelings of familiarity, i.e., an oft-used measure of affective experience along the UVH' familiarity dimension. In conclusion, this multi-method approach using well-validated psychophysiological and self-rating indices of arousal and valence rejects - for passive observation and for explicit affective evaluation of static faces - the main prediction of the UVH.
恐怖谷假说(UVH)的主要预测是,观察那些难以与人类区分开来的类人角色会引发负面情绪状态。通过检查对与明确的虚拟头像和人脸相比具有分类模糊性的刺激的情感体验,采用了成熟的电生理指标[晚期正电位(LPP)和面部肌电图(EMG)]以及自我报告指标[自我评估人体模型(SAM)]来测试这一预测,这些指标用于衡量效价和唤醒水平,即情感体验的主要正交维度(N = 30)。LPP和EMG提供了被动观察期间情感状态的直接心理生理指标,而SAM提供了对静态面部刺激进行明确认知评估期间情感状态的自我报告指标。这些面部图像取自经过良好控制的形态连续体,代表了UVH的类人程度维度(DHL)。结果不支持以下观点:沿着DHL的类别模糊性与负面情感体验的增强存在特定关联。相反,基于LPP和SAM的唤醒水平和效价测量表明,随着与DHL上人类一端的形态距离增加,负面情感状态普遍增加(即唤醒增强和负效价增强)。第二个样本(N = 30)使用了一个临时的熟悉感自评量表,即沿着UVH熟悉度维度常用的情感体验测量方法,得出了相同的结果。总之,这种使用经过充分验证的唤醒水平和效价的心理生理指标和自评指标的多方法研究,对于被动观察和对静态面部的明确情感评估,否定了UVH的主要预测。