Institute for Health & Wellbeing Research, Robert Gordon University Riverside East, Aberdeen, AB10 7GJ, United Kingdom.
Institute for Health & Wellbeing Research, Robert Gordon University Riverside East, Aberdeen, AB10 7GJ, United Kingdom ; Cardiac Unit, Raigmore Hospital Old Perth Road, Inverness, IV2 3UJ, United Kingdom.
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2015 Jun;3(3):e00143. doi: 10.1002/prp2.143. Epub 2015 May 8.
The receptors mediating the hemodynamic responses to cannabinoids are not clearly defined due to the multifarious pharmacology of many commonly used cannabinoid ligands. While both CB1 and TRPV1 receptors are implicated, G protein-coupled receptor 55 (GPR55) may also mediate some of the hemodynamic effects of several atypical cannabinoid ligands. The present studies attempted to unravel the pharmacology underlying the in vivo hemodynamic responses to ACEA (CB1 agonist), O-1602 (GPR55 agonist), AM251 (CB1 antagonist), and cannabidiol (CBD; GPR55 antagonist). Agonist and antagonist profiles of each ligand were determined by ligand-induced GTPγS binding in membrane preparations expressing rat and mouse CB1 and GPR55 receptors. Blood pressure responses to ACEA and O-1602 were recorded in anesthetized and conscious mice (wild type, CB1 (-/-) and GPR55(-/-)) and rats in the absence and presence of AM251 and CBD. ACEA demonstrated GTPγS activation at both receptors, while O-1602 only activated GPR55. AM251 exhibited antagonist activity at CB1 and agonist activity at GPR55, while CBD demonstrated selective antagonist activity at GPR55. The depressor response to ACEA was blocked by AM251 and attenuated by CBD, while O-1602 did not induce a depressor response. AM251 caused a depressor response that was absent in GPR55(-/-) mice but enhanced by CBD, while CBD caused a small vasodepressor response that persisted in GPR55(-/-) mice. Our findings show that assessment of the pharmacological profile of receptor activation by cannabinoid ligands in in vitro studies alongside in vivo functional studies is essential to understand the role of cannabinoids in hemodynamic control.
由于许多常用大麻素配体的药理学多种多样,介导大麻素对血液动力学反应的受体尚不清楚。虽然 CB1 和 TRPV1 受体都有牵连,但 G 蛋白偶联受体 55(GPR55)也可能介导几种非典型大麻素配体的一些血液动力学效应。本研究试图阐明 ACEA(CB1 激动剂)、O-1602(GPR55 激动剂)、AM251(CB1 拮抗剂)和大麻二酚(CBD;GPR55 拮抗剂)体内血液动力学反应的药理学基础。通过在表达大鼠和小鼠 CB1 和 GPR55 受体的膜制剂中配体诱导的 GTPγS 结合,确定每种配体的激动剂和拮抗剂特性。在麻醉和清醒的小鼠(野生型、CB1(-/-)和 GPR55(-/-))和大鼠中记录 ACEA 和 O-1602 对血压的影响,在不存在和存在 AM251 和 CBD 的情况下。ACEA 在两种受体上均显示 GTPγS 激活,而 O-1602 仅激活 GPR55。AM251 在 CB1 上表现出拮抗剂活性,在 GPR55 上表现出激动剂活性,而 CBD 表现出对 GPR55 的选择性拮抗剂活性。AM251 阻断 ACEA 的降压反应并减弱 CBD 的作用,而 O-1602 不引起降压反应。AM251 引起的降压反应在 GPR55(-/-)小鼠中不存在,但被 CBD 增强,而 CBD 引起的小血管扩张性降压反应在 GPR55(-/-)小鼠中持续存在。我们的发现表明,在体外研究中评估大麻素配体对受体激活的药理学特征,以及在体内功能研究中,对于理解大麻素在血液动力学控制中的作用至关重要。