Sun Meng-Jia, Shao Jiang-Yang, Yao Chang-Jiang, Zhong Yu-Wu, Yao Jiannian
Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, CAS Key Laboratory of Photochemistry, Institute of Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
Inorg Chem. 2015 Aug 17;54(16):8136-47. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b01420. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
Five osmium complexes with redox-active amine substituents, Os(ttpy)(Ntpy)2 (1(PF6)2), Os(Ntpy)22 (2(PF6)2), Os(ttpy)(NPhtpy)2 (3(PF6)2), Os(Ntpy)(NPhtpy)2 (4(PF6)2), and Os(NPhtpy)22 (5(PF6)2), have been prepared, where ttpy is 4'-tolyl-2,2':6',2″-terpyridine, Ntpy is 4'-(di-p-anisylamino)-2,2':6',2″-terpyridine, and NPhtpy is 4'-(di-p-anisylaminophen-4-yl)-2,2':6',2″-terpyridine. X-ray crystallographic data of 2(PF6)2 and 4(PF6)2 are presented. These complexes show rich visible absorptions attributed to the singlet metal-to-ligand charge-transfer ((1)MLCT), triplet MLCT, and intraligand charge-transfer transitions. Complexes 3(PF6)2 and 5(PF6)2 show weak emissions around 720 nm at room temperature. All complexes show stepwise oxidations of the osmium ion and the amine segment. However, the redox potentials and the order of the Os(III/II) and N(•+/0) processes vary significantly, depending on the electronic nature of the amine substituents. In the singly oxidized state, either Os(II) → N(•+) MLCT or N → Os(III) ligand-to-metal charge-transfer transitions in the near-infrared region have been observed. For complexes 2(PF6)2, 4(PF6)2, and 5(PF6)2 with two amine substituents, no evidence has been observed for the presence of osmium-mediated amine-amine electronic coupling. Density functional theory (DFT) and time-dependent DFT calculations have been performed to complement these experimental results. The one-electron-oxidized forms 3(3+) and 5(3+) show distinct electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) signals in CH3CN at room temperature. However, complexes 1(3+), 2(3+), and 4(3+) are EPR silent under similar conditions. In addition, a comparison study has been made between these osmium complexes and the previously reported ruthenium analogues.
已制备出五种带有氧化还原活性胺取代基的锇配合物,即Os(ttpy)(Ntpy)2(1(PF6)2)、Os(Ntpy)22(2(PF6)2)、Os(ttpy)(NPhtpy)2(3(PF6)2)、Os(Ntpy)(NPhtpy)2(4(PF6)2)和Os(NPhtpy)22(5(PF6)2),其中ttpy为4'-甲苯基-2,2':6',2″-三联吡啶,Ntpy为4'-(二对甲氧基苯胺基)-2,2':6',2″-三联吡啶,NPhtpy为4'-(二对甲氧基苯胺基苯-4-基)-2,2':6',2″-三联吡啶。给出了2(PF6)2和4(PF6)2的X射线晶体学数据。这些配合物显示出丰富的可见吸收,归因于单重态金属到配体的电荷转移((1)MLCT)、三重态MLCT和配体内电荷转移跃迁。配合物3(PF6)2和5(PF6)2在室温下于720 nm左右显示出微弱发射。所有配合物均显示出锇离子和胺片段的逐步氧化。然而,氧化还原电位以及Os(III/II)和N(•+/0)过程的顺序根据胺取代基的电子性质有显著差异。在单氧化态下,已观察到近红外区域中要么是Os(II)→N(•+)的MLCT,要么是N→Os(III)的配体到金属的电荷转移跃迁。对于具有两个胺取代基的配合物2(PF6)2、4(PF6)2和5(PF6)2,未观察到存在锇介导的胺-胺电子耦合的确切证据。已进行密度泛函理论(DFT)和含时DFT计算以补充这些实验结果。单电子氧化形式3(3+)和5(3+)在室温下于CH3CN中显示出明显的电子顺磁共振(EPR)信号。然而,配合物1(3+)、2(3+)和4(3+)在类似条件下EPR无信号。此外,已对这些锇配合物与先前报道的钌类似物进行了比较研究。