Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Division of Renal Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Swedish Renal Registry, Jönköping, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Apr;31(4):628-35. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfv298. Epub 2015 Aug 4.
The guidelines for anaemia management in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have changed substantially during the past 10 years. We here evaluate whether these changes are followed by subsequent modifications in physicians' anaemia management in Sweden.
We included patients incident to the Swedish Renal Registry for CKD non-dialysis (CKD-ND, referred patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) and haemodialysis (HD) between 2008 and 2013. Time trends in anaemia management were investigated in relation to prescribed medication, laboratory measures and other relevant clinical characteristics. Linear and binominal regression models were used to describe trends across three predefined time periods (2008-09, 2010-11 and 2012-13).
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) use decreased over time among both CKD-ND and HD patients [risk ratio (RR) 2012-13 compared with 2008-09 for CKD-ND 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-0.96; RR for HD 0.95, 95% CI 0.93-0.97]. Mean ESA dose decreased significantly among HD patients (7% in 2010-11 compared with 2008-09 and another 3% during 2012-13). Over the time periods studied, ESA doses increased slightly in the CKD-ND population. Mean haemoglobin (Hb) levels decreased in CKD-ND patients, among both ESA users and non-users, whereas it decreased to a lesser degree, albeit significantly, among HD ESA users. The risk of having an Hb >120 g/L decreased, especially between 2008-09 and 2010-11. Iron use increased over time, mainly in the HD population, but also among CKD-ND ESA non-users.
Changes in guidelines have influenced the clinical anaemia practice of Swedish nephrology care, resulting in lower ESA use and lower Hb levels.
在过去的 10 年中,慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者的贫血管理指南发生了重大变化。我们在此评估这些变化是否会导致瑞典医生随后修改贫血管理。
我们纳入了 2008 年至 2013 年间在瑞典肾脏登记处接受非透析治疗的慢性肾脏病(CKD-ND,指肾小球滤过率<45mL/min/1.73m²的患者)和血液透析(HD)的患者。研究了与处方药物、实验室检查和其他相关临床特征相关的贫血管理的时间趋势。使用线性和二项式回归模型描述了三个预设时间段(2008-09、2010-11 和 2012-13)的趋势。
CKD-ND 和 HD 患者的促红细胞生成素(ESA)使用率随时间降低[CKD-ND 患者 2012-13 年与 2008-09 年相比,风险比(RR)为 0.88,95%置信区间(CI)为 0.81-0.96;HD 患者为 0.95,95%CI 为 0.93-0.97]。HD 患者的 ESA 剂量显著降低(2010-11 年与 2008-09 年相比降低 7%,2012-13 年再降低 3%)。在研究期间,CKD-ND 人群中的 ESA 剂量略有增加。在 ESA 使用者和非使用者中,CKD-ND 患者的平均血红蛋白(Hb)水平均降低,而 HD ESA 使用者的 Hb 水平降低幅度较小,但有显著差异。Hb>120g/L 的风险降低,尤其是在 2008-09 年和 2010-11 年之间。铁的使用随时间增加,主要在 HD 人群中,但也在 CKD-ND ESA 非使用者中增加。
指南的变化影响了瑞典肾病护理的临床贫血实践,导致 ESA 使用减少和 Hb 水平降低。