Suppr超能文献

半月板桡侧撕裂关节镜修复结构的生物力学比较

Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repair constructs for radial tears of the meniscus.

作者信息

Branch Eric A, Milchteim Charles, Aspey Bradley S, Liu Wei, Saliman Justin D, Anz Adam W

机构信息

Andrews Research and Education Institute, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.

Department of Kinesiology, College of Education, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):2270-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546515591994. Epub 2015 Aug 5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial tears of the meniscus represent a challenging clinical scenario because benign neglect and partial meniscectomy have both been shown to have negative biomechanical and long-term clinical consequences.

HYPOTHESIS

Complex suture repair constructs have higher failure loads and stiffness values compared with simple constructs.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

After radial transection of human cadaveric menisci, simulated tears were repaired arthroscopically by use of 1 of 4 repair constructs: (1) 2 inside-out horizontal sutures, (2) 2 all-inside horizontal sutures, (3) an all-inside Mason-Allen construct consisting of 4 sutures, or (4) an all-inside construct consisting of a figure-of-8 suture plus 1 horizontal suture. Meniscus specimens were harvested and tested to failure on an Instron machine. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to evaluate for significance of maximal failure load and stiffness between groups.

RESULTS

The mean maximum failure loads were 64 ± 20 N (inside-out horizontal construct), 75 ± 16 N (all-inside horizontal construct), 86 ± 19 N (Mason-Allen construct), and 113 ± 22 N (figure-of-8 plus horizontal construct). Interconstruct comparison revealed a statistically significant difference between the figure-of-8 plus horizontal construct and all 3 remaining constructs (P < .02) as well as the Mason-Allen construct when compared with the inside-out horizontal construct (P < .01). Statistical significance was not found between the all-inside horizontal construct and the Mason-Allen construct or between the all-inside horizontal construct and the inside-out horizontal construct (P = .2 and .7, respectively). Stiffness values were lower for the inside-out construct compared with the all-inside constructs (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Complex all-inside repair constructs had significantly higher failure loads than a conventional, simple inside-out suture repair construct for repair of radial meniscal tears. Stiffness values among the all-inside groups were greater than those for the inside-out group.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Arthroscopic techniques are presented to produce stronger radial meniscal tear repairs.

摘要

背景

半月板的放射状撕裂是一种具有挑战性的临床情况,因为已证明单纯观察和部分半月板切除术均会产生负面的生物力学和长期临床后果。

假设

与简单结构相比,复杂的缝合修复结构具有更高的破坏载荷和刚度值。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

在对人体尸体半月板进行放射状横断后,通过使用以下4种修复结构中的1种进行关节镜下模拟撕裂修复:(1)2条由外向内的水平缝线;(2)2条全内水平缝线;(3)由4条缝线组成的全内Mason-Allen结构;(4)由1个8字缝线加1条水平缝线组成的全内结构。收获半月板标本并在Instron机器上进行破坏测试。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验评估各组之间最大破坏载荷和刚度的显著性。

结果

平均最大破坏载荷分别为64±20N(由外向内水平结构)、75±16N(全内水平结构)、86±19N(Mason-Allen结构)和113±22N(8字加水平结构)。结构间比较显示,8字加水平结构与其余3种结构之间存在统计学显著差异(P<.02),Mason-Allen结构与由外向内水平结构相比也存在统计学显著差异(P<.01)。全内水平结构与Mason-Allen结构之间以及全内水平结构与由外向内水平结构之间未发现统计学显著性(P分别为.2和.7)。与全内结构相比,由外向内结构的刚度值较低(P<.05)。

结论

对于放射状半月板撕裂的修复,复杂的全内修复结构比传统的简单由外向内缝合修复结构具有显著更高的破坏载荷。全内组的刚度值大于由外向内组。

临床意义

介绍了关节镜技术以实现更强的放射状半月板撕裂修复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验