Suppr超能文献

关节镜下经胫骨隧道前内侧半月板后根部撕裂伤的不同缝合技术的生物力学评估。

Biomechanical evaluation of different suture techniques for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair of posterior medial meniscus root tears.

机构信息

Andreas B. Imhoff, Department of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2013 Dec;41(12):2784-90. doi: 10.1177/0363546513502464. Epub 2013 Sep 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A tear of the posterior medial meniscus root (PMMR) is increasingly recognized as a serious knee joint injury. Several suture techniques for arthroscopic transtibial pull-out repair have been described; however, only limited data about the biomechanical properties of these techniques are currently available.

HYPOTHESIS

There are significant differences between the tested suture techniques, with more complex suture configurations providing superior biomechanical properties.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 40 porcine medial menisci were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups (10 specimens each) according to suture technique: two simple stitches (TSS), horizontal mattress suture (HMS), modified Mason-Allen suture (MMA), and two modified loop stitches (TLS). Meniscus-suture constructs were subjected to cyclic loading followed by load-to-failure testing in a servohydraulic material testing machine.

RESULTS

During cyclic loading, the HMS and TLS groups showed a significantly higher displacement after 100, 500, and 1000 cycles compared with the TSS and MMA groups. After 1000 cycles, the highest displacement was found for the TLS group, with significant differences compared with all other groups. During load-to-failure testing, the highest maximum load and yield load were observed for the MMA group, with statistically significant differences compared with the TSS and TLS groups. With regard to stiffness, the TSS and MMA groups showed significantly higher values compared with the HMS and TLS groups.

CONCLUSION

The MMA technique provided the best biomechanical properties with regard to cyclic loading and load-to-failure testing. The TSS technique seems to be a valuable alternative. Both the HMS and TLS techniques have the disadvantage of lower stiffness and higher displacement during cyclic loading.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Using a MMA technique may improve healing rates and avoid progressive extrusion of the medial meniscus after transtibial pull-out repair of PMMR tears. The TSS technique may be used as an alternative that is easier to perform, but a more careful rehabilitation program is possibly necessary to avoid early failure.

摘要

背景

后内侧半月板根部撕裂(PMMR)越来越被认为是一种严重的膝关节损伤。已经描述了几种用于关节镜经胫骨拉拔修复的缝合技术;然而,目前关于这些技术的生物力学特性只有有限的数据。

假设

测试的缝合技术之间存在显著差异,更复杂的缝合结构提供更好的生物力学特性。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

根据缝合技术,将 40 个猪内侧半月板随机分为 4 组(每组 10 个标本):双简单缝合(TSS)、水平褥式缝合(HMS)、改良 Mason-Allen 缝合(MMA)和双改良环形缝合(TLS)。在伺服液压材料试验机上,对半月板-缝线结构进行循环加载,然后进行失效载荷测试。

结果

在循环加载过程中,HMS 和 TLS 组在经过 100、500 和 1000 次循环后显示出明显更高的位移,与 TSS 和 MMA 组相比。经过 1000 次循环后,TLS 组的位移最高,与所有其他组相比有显著差异。在失效载荷测试中,MMA 组的最大载荷和屈服载荷最高,与 TSS 和 TLS 组相比有统计学意义。在刚度方面,TSS 和 MMA 组明显高于 HMS 和 TLS 组。

结论

MMA 技术在循环加载和失效载荷测试方面提供了最佳的生物力学性能。TSS 技术似乎是一种有价值的替代方法。HMS 和 TLS 技术在循环加载时都有较低的刚度和较高的位移的缺点。

临床相关性

在经胫骨拉拔修复 PMMR 撕裂后,使用 MMA 技术可能会提高愈合率并避免内侧半月板的渐进性挤出。TSS 技术可以作为一种替代方法,操作更简单,但可能需要更仔细的康复计划,以避免早期失败。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验