• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与工作场所健康伙伴关系试点干预项目的大学及学术医疗中心员工的医疗保健支出

Health Care Expenditures for University and Academic Medical Center Employees Enrolled in a Pilot Workplace Health Partner Intervention.

作者信息

Johnston Kenton J, Hockenberry Jason M, Rask Kimberly J, Cunningham Lynn, Brigham Kenneth L, Martin Greg S

机构信息

From the Department of Health Policy and Management (Mr Johnston, Dr Hockenberry, and Dr Rask), Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; Emory-Georgia Tech Predictive Health Institute (Mr Cunningham), Predictive Health Institute; Emory University School of Medicine (Drs Brigham and Martin); and Emory-Georgia Tech Center for Health Discovery and Well-Being (Dr Martin), Atlanta, Ga.

出版信息

J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Aug;57(8):897-903. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000488.

DOI:10.1097/JOM.0000000000000488
PMID:26247644
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5674521/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a pilot workplace health partner intervention delivered by a predictive health institute to university and academic medical center employees on per-member, per-month health care expenditures.

METHODS

We analyzed the health care claims of participants versus nonparticipants, with a 12-month baseline and 24-month intervention period. Total per-member, per-month expenditures were analyzed using two-part regression models that controlled for sex, age, health benefit plan type, medical member months, and active employment months.

RESULTS

Our regression results found no statistical differences in total expenditures at baseline and intervention. Further sensitivity analyses controlling for high cost outliers, comorbidities, and propensity to be in the intervention group confirmed these findings.

CONCLUSIONS

We find no difference in health care expenditures attributable to the health partner intervention. The intervention does not seem to have raised expenditures in the short term.

摘要

目的

评估一家预测健康机构为大学和学术医疗中心员工提供的试点工作场所健康伙伴干预措施对每位成员每月医疗保健支出的影响。

方法

我们分析了参与者与非参与者的医疗保健索赔情况,基线期为12个月,干预期为24个月。使用双部分回归模型分析每位成员每月的总支出,该模型控制了性别、年龄、健康福利计划类型、医疗成员月数和在职月数。

结果

我们的回归结果发现基线期和干预期的总支出没有统计学差异。进一步控制高成本异常值、合并症和干预组倾向的敏感性分析证实了这些发现。

结论

我们发现健康伙伴干预措施对医疗保健支出没有影响。该干预措施在短期内似乎没有增加支出。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f693/5674521/e37b4f511fe0/nihms684236f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f693/5674521/e37b4f511fe0/nihms684236f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f693/5674521/e37b4f511fe0/nihms684236f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Health Care Expenditures for University and Academic Medical Center Employees Enrolled in a Pilot Workplace Health Partner Intervention.参与工作场所健康伙伴关系试点干预项目的大学及学术医疗中心员工的医疗保健支出
J Occup Environ Med. 2015 Aug;57(8):897-903. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000488.
2
Estimated economic costs of obesity to U.S. business.肥胖对美国企业造成的估计经济成本。
Am J Health Promot. 1998 Nov-Dec;13(2):120-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.2.120.
3
Carrots and sticks: impact of an incentive/disincentive employee flexible credit benefit plan on health status and medical costs.胡萝卜加大棒:激励/抑制型员工灵活信贷福利计划对健康状况和医疗成本的影响
Am J Health Promot. 1999 May-Jun;13(5):260-7. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-13.5.260.
4
Health and disability costs of depressive illness in a major U.S. corporation.美国一家大型公司中抑郁症的健康和残疾成本。
Am J Psychiatry. 2000 Aug;157(8):1274-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.8.1274.
5
[Workplace Health Management -- sick employees cost you money].[工作场所健康管理——患病员工会让你损失金钱]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2013 Nov;138(48):2484. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1359857. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
The relationship between health promotion program participation and medical costs: a dose response.健康促进项目参与度与医疗费用之间的关系:剂量反应
J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Nov;45(11):1196-200. doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000095002.12772.6a.
7
Managing manifest diseases, but not health risks, saved PepsiCo money over seven years.在七年时间里,管理显性疾病而非健康风险为百事公司节省了资金。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Jan;33(1):124-31. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0625.
8
The effects of expanded mental health benefits on treatment costs.扩大心理健康福利对治疗成本的影响。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 2006 Mar;9(1):25-33.
9
The relationship between modifiable health risks and group-level health care expenditures. Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO) Research Committee.可改变的健康风险与群体层面医疗保健支出之间的关系。健康促进研究组织(HERO)研究委员会。
Am J Health Promot. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(1):45-52. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-15.1.45.
10
Employee health benefit redesign at the academic health center: a case study.学术医疗中心的员工健康福利重新设计:案例研究。
Acad Med. 2013 Mar;88(3):328-34. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318281a71c.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of interventions targeting health behaviors in university and college staff: a systematic review.针对高校教职工健康行为的干预措施的有效性:一项系统综述。
Am J Health Promot. 2015 May-Jun;29(5):e169-87. doi: 10.4278/ajhp.130619-LIT-313. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
2
The gross domestic product and health care spending.国内生产总值与医疗保健支出。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jul 11;369(2):107-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1305298. Epub 2013 May 22.
3
A review and analysis of the clinical and cost-effectiveness studies of comprehensive health promotion and disease management programs at the worksite: update VIII 2008 to 2010.
对工作场所的综合健康促进和疾病管理计划的临床和成本效益研究进行的回顾和分析:2008 年至 2010 年的更新 VIII。
J Occup Environ Med. 2011 Nov;53(11):1310-31. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182337748.
4
Integrating comparative effectiveness research programs into predictive health: a unique role for academic health centers.将比较效果研究计划融入预测健康:学术医疗中心的独特作用。
Acad Med. 2011 Jun;86(6):718-23. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217ea6c.
5
Recession contributes to slowest annual rate of increase in health spending in five decades.经济衰退导致医疗支出年增长率降至 50 年来最低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jan;30(1):11-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1032.
6
Predictive health: the imminent revolution in health care.预测健康:医疗保健领域即将到来的革命。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Oct;58 Suppl 2(0 2):S298-302. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03107.x.
7
Workplace wellness programs can generate savings.工作场所健康促进计划可以节省成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Feb;29(2):304-11. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0626. Epub 2010 Jan 14.
8
A longitudinal study on the relationship between weight loss, medical expenditures, and absenteeism among overweight employees in the WAY to Health study.WAY 健康研究中,一项关于超重员工体重减轻、医疗支出和旷工之间关系的纵向研究。
J Occup Environ Med. 2009 Dec;51(12):1367-73. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181c2bb56.
9
Job-based health insurance: costs climb at a moderate pace.基于工作的健康保险:成本以适中的速度攀升。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Nov-Dec;28(6):w1002-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.6.w1002. Epub 2009 Sep 15.
10
Perspective: Prospective health care and the role of academic medicine: lead, follow, or get out of the way.观点:前瞻性医疗保健与学术医学的作用:引领、跟随还是让道。
Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):707-14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31817ec800.